Rare Rehearing Could Derail High Court Voting Ruling

Rare Rehearing Could Derail High Court Voting Ruling

Author: Bloomberg Law February 9, 2023 Duration: 17:58
A potential blockbuster ruling on the way states determine their voting rules could be hijacked by the North Carolina Supreme Court after the 2022 elections flipped control of the state court to Republicans. The justices heard arguments in Moore v. Harper in December, and are likely on their way to hammering out a decision. But on Feb. 2 the newly constituted North Carolina Supreme Court issued a rare rehearing order in the case, potentially depriving the justices of the opportunity to clarify the law nationwide. UCLA election expert Rick Hasen explains why it seems likely that the Republican majority will flex its muscle and reverse course, and what it could mean if the justices must wait to decide the issue in the context of a highly contested presidential election. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

Every Monday, the legal world turns its attention to the nation's highest bench, and Cases and Controversies is there to provide essential context. This Bloomberg Law podcast goes beyond the headlines to examine the real-world implications of the Supreme Court's docket. Rather than dry legal summaries, you'll hear nuanced discussions that unpack the complex narratives and strategic thinking behind pivotal cases. Each episode either sets the stage for upcoming oral arguments or delves into a consequential ruling with the people who know it best. The conversations feature a range of voices, including seasoned Supreme Court advocates, federal judges, astute law professors, practicing attorneys, and sharp legal journalists. Together, they explore the tensions and philosophies shaping American jurisprudence. Tuning into this podcast offers a front-row seat to the debates that define our rights, our institutions, and our society. It’s for anyone who wants to understand not just what the Court decides, but how and why those decisions are made, presented with the clarity and authority you expect from Bloomberg Law.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

Cases and Controversies
Podcast Episodes
Justices to Weigh Evidence Rule in Reverse Discrimination Suit [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 19:10
The US Supreme Court will hear arguments in a reverse discrimination case when the justices return to the bench at the end of the month. A heterosexual woman is asking the court to revive her lawsuit against the Ohio Dep…
Trump Actions Spark Potential Legal Challenges for Supreme Court [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 17:55
President Donald Trump’s executive orders have sparked a flurry of legal challenges that tee-up constitutional questions about the breadth of executive power the US Supreme Court may be forced to settle. Daniel Cotter, a…
Supreme Court Mulls Test for Reasonable Force in Police Killings [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 19:59
Supreme Court justices seemed to agree courts should look at the totality of circumstances when analyzing whether a police officer's use of deadly force was reasonable. During arguments Wednesday, the US Supreme Court ap…
Justices Mull Scrutiny Test In Porn Site Age Verification Case [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 16:36
Several justices on the Supreme Court seemed eager this week to debate the constitutionality of a Texas law that requires porn sites to verify the age of users to keep kids from viewing obscene content online. But the co…
Social Media, National Security Collide in TikTok Argument [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 18:56
The much-anticipated argument of the future of TikTok in the US will be heard by the Supreme Court on Friday. Cases and Controversies hosts Kimberly Robinson and Lydia Wheeler preview the case with Knight First Amendment…
Broadway, Books, and Big Rulings Cap Supreme Court Year [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 15:13
After an eventful 2024, the justices are now on winter break until Jan. 10. "Cases and Controversies" hosts Kimberly Robinson, Lydia Wheeler, and Greg Stohr review all the biggest news stories from the justices in 2024,…
Justices Lean Into Agency Deference in Environmental Challenge [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 16:22
Justices from across the ideological spectrum appeared primed to limit the scope of environmental impact reviews, but it's unclear if they need a new test to do so. Cases and Controversies hosts Kimberly Robinson and Gre…
Supreme Court Weighs Transgender Case Broader Impact [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 24:04
Justices on both sides of the US Supreme Court’s ideological line seemed concerned about a future ruling on gender-affirming care for minors reaching far beyond Tennessee and transgender kids. Whether an appeals court er…
High Court Vaping Case Tests FDA's Regulatory Powers [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 19:06
A case testing the federal government's ability to regulate potentially harmful tobacco products will kick off arguments at the US Supreme Court in December. The Biden Administration is fighting to keep off the market ne…
Nvidia Highlights Justices' Struggle in Drawing Lines [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 17:08
The US Supreme Court struggled with where to draw the appropriate lines in bread-and-butter cases involving Nvidia Corp., criminal law, and immigration deadlines. In the securities case, the court looked for what Chief J…