Worker Religious Accommodation Test Set for Top Court

Worker Religious Accommodation Test Set for Top Court

Author: Bloomberg Law April 6, 2023 Duration: 25:41
An Evangelical Christian postal carrier in Pennsylvania, who says he was forced out of the job for refusing to work on Sundays, wants the US Supreme Court to do more to accommodate workers’ religious practices. Cases and Controversies explores the issues around faith in Groff v. DeJoy, which is set for argument April 18. The justices are being asked to overturn a ruling that said employers aren’t required to bear more than a “de minimus” cost in accommodating an employee’s religious exercise under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act. That law prohibits discrimination in the workplace based on someone’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It’s a decision some of the court’s conservatives have been eager to revisit. Joshua Matz filed a brief on behalf of Americans United for Separation of Church and State and Lambda Legal in support of the US Postal Service. He joins the podcast to discuss why the court’s 1977 decision in Trans World Airlines Inc. v. Hardison should be revised. Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

Every Monday, the legal world turns its attention to the nation's highest bench, and Cases and Controversies is there to provide essential context. This Bloomberg Law podcast goes beyond the headlines to examine the real-world implications of the Supreme Court's docket. Rather than dry legal summaries, you'll hear nuanced discussions that unpack the complex narratives and strategic thinking behind pivotal cases. Each episode either sets the stage for upcoming oral arguments or delves into a consequential ruling with the people who know it best. The conversations feature a range of voices, including seasoned Supreme Court advocates, federal judges, astute law professors, practicing attorneys, and sharp legal journalists. Together, they explore the tensions and philosophies shaping American jurisprudence. Tuning into this podcast offers a front-row seat to the debates that define our rights, our institutions, and our society. It’s for anyone who wants to understand not just what the Court decides, but how and why those decisions are made, presented with the clarity and authority you expect from Bloomberg Law.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

Cases and Controversies
Podcast Episodes
Supreme Court Urged to Take Up Fight Over Trans Youth [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 14:04
The Biden administration and others are asking the Supreme Court to weigh in on state bans on gender-affirming care for transgender kids despite its refusal to resolve related disputes over youth sports and student bathr…
Divide Surfaces in Supreme Court Trump Ballot Ruling [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 19:36
Headlines touting the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision to keep Donald Trump on the Colorado presidential ballot obscured division among the justices over the Constitution’s insurrection clause. UC Davis School of Law p…
Supreme Court Digs into Guns, Social Media, and Trump Immunity [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 13:01
It was a big week at the Supreme Court with arguments over social media and guns, and a grant on Donald Trump’s bid for immunity from prosecution over alleged election interference. Cases and Controversies hosts Kimberly…
Social Media Cases Could Impact Public Discourse Online [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 22:41
The Supreme Court will hear arguments Monday in fights over laws in Florida and Texas that seek to stop social media platforms from censoring conservative speech online. At issue are provisions that require platforms to…
Supreme Court Weighs Next Steps on Trump Immunity Bid [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 16:54
Supreme Court justices have a number of things to sort out before deciding whether to take up or reject the question of whether Donald Trump can be prosecuted for election interference. Should the justices give Trump ano…
Historic Trump Ballot Argument Explored Numerous Paths [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 12:49
Supreme Court arguments in Colorado’s bid to remove Donald Trump from the state’s presidential primary ballot tested a number of legal principles and scenarios. The justices dove into the potential impact on their delibe…
High Court ‘Friends’ Urge Caution in Trump Ballot Case [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 27:35
The Supreme Court will hold a special session Feb. 8 to consider whether Colorado can keep Donald Trump off the primary ballot. Notre Dame Law School professor Derek Muller joins Cases and Controversies to explain the le…
Trump’s Supreme Court Case Raises Security Questions [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 13:50
Supreme Court justices will soon hear argument on Donald Trump’s appeal to stay on the Colorado primary ballot, but another question for the court is whether the former president will attend the proceedings. Trump has do…
With Chevron Doctrine Likely to Fall, What Comes Next? [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 14:25
The conservative-led Supreme Court seems primed to nix a bedrock principle governing the relationship between administrative agencies and federal courts. Cases and Controversies hosts Kimberly Robinson and Lydia Wheeler…
Trump, Agency Power Fights Tee-Up Historic Court Term [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 24:31
Big challenges to federal agency regulatory powers at the Supreme Court could end up as a footnote to what’s shaping up to be a momentous term. Hosts Lydia Wheeler and Kimberly Robinson discuss how the court set up a his…