Everything you know about dipole (calculators) is wrong ...

Everything you know about dipole (calculators) is wrong ...

Author: Onno (VK6FLAB) October 13, 2018 Duration: 3:44
Foundations of Amateur Radio

The other day I did an experiment. I searched for "dipole calculator" and using the first 20 results I calculated the length of a dipole suitable for 7.130 MHz. I chose the frequency for no other reason that there is a 7130 DX net every Monday, Wednesday and Friday and for the longest time I've been unable to participate due to the lack of a HF antenna in my new shack.

So here's some things I learnt from doing this experiment.

Depending on which calculator I use, the length of my dipole can vary by over a meter from longest to shortest result.

Depending on my desire to use metric or imperial measurements, my dipole will be a different length, because of course electrons move at a different speed if you're not using the metric system.

In case you're wondering, 1 inch is defined as being exactly 2.54 cm, so there's plenty of opportunity to vary that.

Speaking of standards, we all agree that the speed of light is a constant, right? Turns out that for some calculators, you can change the speed of light.

I'll skip over the notion that none of the calculators actually show what they're using as the speed of light and move on to other interesting discoveries.

Apparently you can determine the length of a dipole down to the sub-atomic length, with one calculator going down to the size of an electron to indicate how much wire you should cut from a spool.

There are forms that make doing the calculation really easy, single box to type in the frequency, so the answer must be right.

There are some that use random standard numbers, even a text book example that uses some number, but no indication where it comes from. For example, the number 486 features regularly, but so does 150 and 5905.

There are forms that provide you with several boxes, but no indication which box needs what value, so your answer may or may not indicate the number of eggs per chicken per parsec.

One dipole calculator result is actually for a vertical, so your search engine helping you might not actually give you the calculator you expect.

There are percentage correction factors. 5% seems to be a favourite number, but no indication as to what the origin of that number is.

There's a calculator that allows you to specify the feed point impedance, not sure how that works, but it's a nice feature to have when you're calculating the length of your dipole. Not.

One regular instruction is to cut long, that is, measure your wire and cut it longer than the calculator states. How much longer is left as an exercise to the reader. Should it be 1 mm longer, 1 cm longer, or should it be 1 m longer and how much should that change if the frequency changes?

Let's move on. The word ground features heavily in these calculators. The phrase "average ground" does too. No indication as to what makes an average ground, or how to go about determining what changes if your ground isn't average.

We all agree that the dipole should be half a wave-length above the ground, right?

How much is that?

The same wave length as the length of the dipole we've just calculated, or a different one?

How does the length of the dipole vary if the height varies? While we're looking at variation, how much variation is there depending on how thick the wire you're using is and what about insulation? None of those things are even mentioned in any of these calculators.

Dipole calculators, wonderful invention, shame about the implementation.

I'm Onno VK6FLAB


For anyone curious about the crackle of a distant voice emerging from the static or the thrill of making a contact across the globe using nothing but radio waves, Foundations of Amateur Radio offers a friendly, steady guide. Hosted by Onno (VK6FLAB) from Australia, this long-running podcast acts as a companion for newcomers navigating the initial, often overwhelming, steps into this vast hobby. Each episode deliberately unpacks a single facet of amateur radio, breaking down technical concepts, equipment, and operating practices into digestible pieces. You'll hear practical advice on how to get started, find your place within the global community, and discover which of the hobby's countless avenues-from building antennas to satellite communication or emergency service-might spark your passion. It’s not about dry theory; it’s about demystifying the process and sharing the genuine rewards that keep enthusiasts engaged for a lifetime. Having evolved from its earlier incarnation in 2011, this podcast builds from the ground up, week by week, creating a solid resource that grows with you. Tune in for a down-to-earth conversation that makes the airwaves feel a little more accessible and a lot more inviting.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 579

Foundations of Amateur Radio
Podcast Episodes
What's in an S-unit? [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 10:43
Foundations of Amateur Radio The other day fellow amateur Randall VK6WR raised an interesting question. Using his HP 8920A RF Communications Test Set, which you might recall from our adventures in measuring radio harmoni…
Where is the spark .. gap? [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 8:35
Foundations of Amateur Radio The thing I love most about this amazing hobby of amateur radio is the sheer size of the community and the depth of knowledge that comes with it. Case in point, the other day I mentioned the…
Bald Yak 18: Everything Everywhere All at Once? [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 7:02
Foundations of Amateur Radio The other day I was playing around with RDS, or Radio Data System, it's a digital signal that's often embedded in a commercial broadcast FM transmission. Among other things it contains inform…
Bald Yak 17: Adventures in Radio Data Systems [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 5:01
Foundations of Amateur Radio While spending some quality time discovering what I don't know about GNU Radio, I explored the notion of attempting to at least understand a little more about how an FM signal works. Dependin…
Bald Yak 16: How do you decode FM? [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 6:51
Foundations of Amateur Radio How do you make a hole? That's a pretty straightforward kind of question, and by the time this sentence is finished, there's going to be at least as many answers as people who considered it.…
One step forward ... three steps back. [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 5:38
Foundations of Amateur Radio Still excited from my minor victory in discovering a missing puzzle piece associated with the project I'm working on, I spent the past week introducing my head, if not literally, at least fig…
Bald Yak 15, Playing with Radio .. now with software [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 6:48
Foundations of Amateur Radio A little while ago I discussed a lovely article by programmer, artist, and game designer "blinry" called "Fifty Things you can do with a Software Defined Radio". This week it occurred to me t…
How to go about documenting your setup? [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 5:22
Foundations of Amateur Radio How to go about documenting your setup? Possibly the single most important thing that separates science from "fiddling around" is documentation. Figuring out how to document things is often n…
Transmitting into a dummy load .. for a year .. on purpose. [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 8:34
Foundations of Amateur Radio Just under a year ago I started an experiment. I set-up a beacon for WSPR, or Weak Signal Propagation Reporter, transmitting at 200 mW into a dummy load using eight bands between 80m and 10m.…
How to become a radio amateur today? [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 6:02
Foundations of Amateur Radio The other day a fellow amateur revealed that they qualified for membership of the QWCA, the Quarter Century Wireless Association .. twice over .. there may have been some innocent whistling i…