Is nihilism compatible with love? Does being "cool" require authenticity, or is trying to be cool already a losing battle? How much should we care about the moral failings of artists whose music we can't stop listening to? And what exactly is post-punk, anyway?
These are not just good questions. They are, it turns out, some of philosophy's oldest and most unresolved questions, dressed in black, surrounded by synthesizers, and released on an independent label in 1979.
In this episode of Good Is In The Details, Gwendolyn Dolske and Rudy Salo welcome back two returning favorites: Professor Joshua Heter (Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Jefferson College) and Professor Richard Greene(Professor of Philosophy and Director of the Richards Richards Institute for Ethics, Weber State University) — co-editors of Post-Punk and Philosophy: Rip It Up and Think Again (Open Universe, 2024) and its predecessor Punk Rock and Philosophy: Research and Destroy (2022), hailed as "a really fascinating book reflecting diverse points of view: thought-provoking, intelligent, and controversial" by John Holmstrom, founding Editor-in-Chief of PUNK magazine.
The previous episode on punk was so popular, and so many listeners wrote in asking for more, that Gwendolyn and Rudy made it up to everyone by going longer and deeper this time. The result is one of the most genuinely fun and intellectually alive conversations this show has produced.
What we explore in this episode:
- What post-punk actually is — and why defining it turns out to be a serious philosophical problem about genre, authenticity, and artistic identity
- Why the human brain connects to music so differently than to other art forms — and what that reveals about consciousness, emotion, and the nature of aesthetic experience
- The ethics of fandom: how much should an artist's moral failures affect our relationship to their work — and what does philosophy say about separating art from artist?
- Nihilism, authenticity, and the examined life: how post-punk bands from Joy Division to The Cure grappled with existentialist questions that academic philosophers were wrestling with at the same time
- Whether technological innovation in music guarantees artistic innovation — or whether the reverse is sometimes true
- The DIY ethic and its philosophical roots: what punk and post-punk share with Kantian autonomy, Marxist class consciousness, and ancient Greek ideas about self-governance
- What it means to be cool — and why the philosophy of coolness is a surprisingly rich field of inquiry
- Whether counterculture requires a commitment to social change, or whether a movement can be radical purely through its art
- Why post-punk may be punk's "more brainy offspring" — and why that intellectual DNA makes it unusually fertile ground for philosophical analysis
- What music tells us about what it means to be human — and why the connection we feel to musicians is philosophically distinct from our connection to other artists
This is the episode that will make you listen to your favorite post-punk record differently. And possibly pick up a philosophy book while you're at it.
Guests: Professor Joshua Heter — Assistant Professor of Philosophy, Jefferson College; co-editor of Post-Punk and Philosophy and Punk Rock and Philosophy (Open Universe); co-host of the podcast I Think, Therefore I Fan. Professor Richard Greene — Professor of Philosophy and Director of the Richards Richards Institute for Ethics, Weber State University; past Director of the Intercollegiate Ethics Bowl; author of Spoiler Alert: It's a Book About the Philosophy of Spoilers; co-editor of more than twenty books on pop culture and philosophy; co-host of I Think, Therefore I Fan.
Get your copy of this wonderful collection of essays: Post Punk and Philosophy.
Get more content and support the pod: https://www.patreon.com/GoodIsInTheDetails
Take Gwendolyn's course: How To Create Your Podcast.
https://www.goodisinthedetails.com
Thank you to our partner for this episode: https://studioqueenhair.com
