Lindsay Clancy Jury Foreperson Reported WHAT About One Juror?!

Lindsay Clancy Jury Foreperson Reported WHAT About One Juror?!

Author: True Crime Today September 14, 2026 Duration: 42:04

The Lindsay Clancy jury deadlock turned into a legal argument over one juror and one reported admission. Kevin Reddington told the court that the foreperson said a holdout had acknowledged doubt yet would not apply Judge William Sullivan’s instructions on reasonable doubt. 

Reddington wanted the juror removed. Sullivan instead questioned the jurors about their ability to follow the law, repeated the reasonable-doubt instruction, and refused to replace the holdout based on the information before him. The jury remained stuck, and the case ended in a mistrial on September 4 after more than 38 hours of deliberations over seven days. 

The courtroom fight was followed by another dispute outside it. On September 8, Patrick Clancy’s lawyer Howard Cooper said social-media accusations tying Patrick to the deaths of his children were false, described the campaign as escalating and destructive, and said law enforcement had been notified. 

Robin Dreeke, a former FBI counterintelligence behavioral expert and Hidden Killers co-host, joins Tony Brueski to examine what prolonged deadlock can do to trust, persuasion, and group pressure without assigning motives to a juror he never interviewed. Eric Faddis, a defense attorney and former felony prosecutor, breaks down when a judge may investigate possible juror misconduct and why courts are cautious about intruding into deliberations. 

Faddis also examines the Patrick Clancy dispute: the difference between harsh opinion and a false factual accusation, and how lawyers can seek identifying information tied to anonymous accounts. He also explains what a statement that law enforcement has been notified does and does not establish. September 29 is the next scheduled court date while the prosecution weighs another trial. 

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292
 
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod 

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #HiddenKillers #ReasonableDoubt #JuryDeliberations #RobinDreeke #EricFaddis #OnlineConspiracies #DefamationLaw #TrueCrime 


Each week, Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary cuts through the noise of the daily headlines to examine the darker stories unfolding in real time. Hosted by Tony Brueski and presented by True Crime Today, this isn't just a recap of events; it's a deep, analytical dive into the cases that dominate the news cycle, asking the difficult questions that often go unasked. You'll hear detailed commentary on ongoing trials, breaking developments in high-profile investigations, and discussions on the societal and psychological patterns that these crimes reveal. The podcast operates at the intersection of news and thoughtful analysis, providing context where there is often only sensation. Rather than simply presenting facts, Tony engages with the material, offering a perspective that challenges listeners to think critically about the true crime stories they believe they know. It’s for those who follow the news with a keen eye and want to understand the "why" behind the "what." Tune in for a sober, engaging conversation that treats these serious subjects with the depth they demand, making this a standout offering in the true crime genre for anyone seeking more than surface-level reporting.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 50

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Podcast Episodes
Farwell's Defense Claims THIS About Sandra Birchmore [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 20:59
The defense in the Matthew Farwell case is building its strategy around Sandra Birchmore's mental health records, her journals, and her history of instability. They want the jury to see a woman who killed herself. Prosec…
Wendi Adelson's Ex-Boyfriend Testified to WHAT Under Oath? [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 28:32
Five days before the murder, Wendi Adelson's boyfriend says she told him her brother had looked into hiring a hitman. The day before, she asked him about his Friday driving route near Dan Markel's house, then told him no…
Patrick Clancy's Lawyer Told Conspiracy Theorists What's Coming [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 12:25
Lindsay Clancy admitted through her defense that she killed her three children — Cora, Dawson, and Callan — in their Duxbury home in January 2023. The trial was solely about whether she was criminally responsible. It end…
Biggie's Case — What the LAPD Did to the Investigation [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 10:58
Every time a detective got close to solving the murder of Christopher Wallace, the LAPD pulled the plug. The first investigator followed the evidence to two of the department's own officers. His chief ordered him to stop…
Why Lindsay Clancy’s Case Is Farther From Over Than Ever [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 58:34
The trial ended. The case multiplied. Lindsay Clancy’s jury split eleven to one. The mistrial was declared. And instead of a resolution, the legal fight broke into three separate tracks — a potential retrial, two civil m…
Lindsay Clancy: The Defense Move That Could Shut Down a Retrial [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 20:13
What happens if the judge won’t end Lindsay Clancy’s case? Kevin Reddington had an answer ready before a retrial was even announced.After the mistrial, he asked for a fast hearing—and, if he lost that argument, jury sele…