Lindsay Clancy's Holdout Left WHAT on the Table?!

Lindsay Clancy's Holdout Left WHAT on the Table?!

Author: True Crime Today September 12, 2026 Duration: 44:24

The Lindsay Clancy mistrial left the murder charges unresolved, but Kevin Reddington says the jury room was far from evenly divided. According to Clancy's defense attorney, eleven jurors were ready to acquit on criminal-responsibility grounds and one juror would not join them. 

That reported split followed more than 38 hours of deliberations across seven days. The foreperson raised a dispute over whether the holdout was applying reasonable doubt, while Judge William Sullivan concluded he did not have a basis to remove the juror or press the inquiry further. The defense then sought emergency relief from the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, and that request was denied before Sullivan formally declared the mistrial. 

The fight shifted immediately to what happens next. Reddington said he would ask Sullivan to reconsider a required finding of not guilty, which would end the prosecution without another jury if the judge granted it. He also signaled that he wanted a fast ruling and a fast return to jury selection if the motion failed. Sullivan chose a slower schedule and set September 29, 2026, for argument, status, and possible trial assignment. 

Tony Brueski is joined by criminal defense attorney Bob Motta to test what the 11-1 claim really means for both sides. Bob looks at the leverage prosecutors have after a near-acquittal, the limits on what anyone can infer from a deadlocked panel, and the strategic risk of asking twelve new jurors to decide the same insanity-defense dispute. 

District Attorney Timothy Cruz had not announced a retrial decision when the first trial ended. Patrick Clancy's attorney said another trial would force Patrick and his family to relive a tragedy they can never close. That leaves one hard question hanging over the next court date: what would the Commonwealth have to believe it can do differently before asking everyone to go through the case again? 

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod 

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

#LindsayClancy #KevinReddington #HiddenKillers #BobMotta #Mistrial #HungJury #CriminalResponsibility #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PatrickClancy #Retrial 


Each week, Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary cuts through the noise of the daily headlines to examine the darker stories unfolding in real time. Hosted by Tony Brueski and presented by True Crime Today, this isn't just a recap of events; it's a deep, analytical dive into the cases that dominate the news cycle, asking the difficult questions that often go unasked. You'll hear detailed commentary on ongoing trials, breaking developments in high-profile investigations, and discussions on the societal and psychological patterns that these crimes reveal. The podcast operates at the intersection of news and thoughtful analysis, providing context where there is often only sensation. Rather than simply presenting facts, Tony engages with the material, offering a perspective that challenges listeners to think critically about the true crime stories they believe they know. It’s for those who follow the news with a keen eye and want to understand the "why" behind the "what." Tune in for a sober, engaging conversation that treats these serious subjects with the depth they demand, making this a standout offering in the true crime genre for anyone seeking more than surface-level reporting.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 50

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Podcast Episodes
Farwell's Defense Claims THIS About Sandra Birchmore [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 20:59
The defense in the Matthew Farwell case is building its strategy around Sandra Birchmore's mental health records, her journals, and her history of instability. They want the jury to see a woman who killed herself. Prosec…
Wendi Adelson's Ex-Boyfriend Testified to WHAT Under Oath? [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 28:32
Five days before the murder, Wendi Adelson's boyfriend says she told him her brother had looked into hiring a hitman. The day before, she asked him about his Friday driving route near Dan Markel's house, then told him no…
Patrick Clancy's Lawyer Told Conspiracy Theorists What's Coming [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 12:25
Lindsay Clancy admitted through her defense that she killed her three children — Cora, Dawson, and Callan — in their Duxbury home in January 2023. The trial was solely about whether she was criminally responsible. It end…
Biggie's Case — What the LAPD Did to the Investigation [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 10:58
Every time a detective got close to solving the murder of Christopher Wallace, the LAPD pulled the plug. The first investigator followed the evidence to two of the department's own officers. His chief ordered him to stop…
Why Lindsay Clancy’s Case Is Farther From Over Than Ever [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 58:34
The trial ended. The case multiplied. Lindsay Clancy’s jury split eleven to one. The mistrial was declared. And instead of a resolution, the legal fight broke into three separate tracks — a potential retrial, two civil m…
Lindsay Clancy: The Defense Move That Could Shut Down a Retrial [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 20:13
What happens if the judge won’t end Lindsay Clancy’s case? Kevin Reddington had an answer ready before a retrial was even announced.After the mistrial, he asked for a fast hearing—and, if he lost that argument, jury sele…