Lindsay Clancy's Mistrial Put Tim Cruz Under WHAT Pressure?!

Lindsay Clancy's Mistrial Put Tim Cruz Under WHAT Pressure?!

Author: True Crime Today September 12, 2026 Duration: 57:25

The Lindsay Clancy case now has a prosecutor weighing a retrial, a defense lawyer making national appeals, and a surviving father pushing back against an online campaign aimed at him. Eric Faddis, defense attorney and former prosecutor, joins Tony Brueski to show how those three developments change the ground under Plymouth County DA Tim Cruz.

Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial on September 4, 2026, after the jury spent about 38 hours deliberating across seven days. Kevin Reddington says the split was 11-1 for acquittal. Afterward, he asked President Trump to consider a pardon that federal power cannot provide in a Massachusetts case. Reddington also made his negotiating line public: he says he will not plead Lindsay Clancy to any jail time.
A September 29 hearing remains the next major court date.

Patrick Clancy's attorney Howard Cooper then addressed the conspiracy claims that have circulated online about Patrick. His statement described a relentless, escalating and destructive defamation campaign, promised appropriate legal measures, and said law enforcement had been notified. Eric explains what that can mean for creators who assume a screen name or the phrase "just my opinion" will protect them.

Cruz has not announced a retrial decision. He said after the mistrial that his office believed Lindsay Clancy was in control of her actions and described the case as cruel and calculated.

Eric walks through the prosecutor's problem from the inside. He explains how an office reviews a case after a near-acquittal and how a reported 11-1 split can change defense leverage. Patrick Clancy's position adds the human cost of another trial, while the defamation fight adds another layer of public attention. Cruz has the charging power.
The question is what he does with it next.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#LindsayClancy #TimCruz #HiddenKillers #EricFaddis #PatrickClancy #KevinReddington #Retrial #Mistrial #ClancyTrial #TrueCrime


Each week, Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary cuts through the noise of the daily headlines to examine the darker stories unfolding in real time. Hosted by Tony Brueski and presented by True Crime Today, this isn't just a recap of events; it's a deep, analytical dive into the cases that dominate the news cycle, asking the difficult questions that often go unasked. You'll hear detailed commentary on ongoing trials, breaking developments in high-profile investigations, and discussions on the societal and psychological patterns that these crimes reveal. The podcast operates at the intersection of news and thoughtful analysis, providing context where there is often only sensation. Rather than simply presenting facts, Tony engages with the material, offering a perspective that challenges listeners to think critically about the true crime stories they believe they know. It’s for those who follow the news with a keen eye and want to understand the "why" behind the "what." Tune in for a sober, engaging conversation that treats these serious subjects with the depth they demand, making this a standout offering in the true crime genre for anyone seeking more than surface-level reporting.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 50

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Podcast Episodes
Farwell's Defense Claims THIS About Sandra Birchmore [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 20:59
The defense in the Matthew Farwell case is building its strategy around Sandra Birchmore's mental health records, her journals, and her history of instability. They want the jury to see a woman who killed herself. Prosec…
Wendi Adelson's Ex-Boyfriend Testified to WHAT Under Oath? [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 28:32
Five days before the murder, Wendi Adelson's boyfriend says she told him her brother had looked into hiring a hitman. The day before, she asked him about his Friday driving route near Dan Markel's house, then told him no…
Patrick Clancy's Lawyer Told Conspiracy Theorists What's Coming [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 12:25
Lindsay Clancy admitted through her defense that she killed her three children — Cora, Dawson, and Callan — in their Duxbury home in January 2023. The trial was solely about whether she was criminally responsible. It end…
Biggie's Case — What the LAPD Did to the Investigation [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 10:58
Every time a detective got close to solving the murder of Christopher Wallace, the LAPD pulled the plug. The first investigator followed the evidence to two of the department's own officers. His chief ordered him to stop…
Why Lindsay Clancy’s Case Is Farther From Over Than Ever [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 58:34
The trial ended. The case multiplied. Lindsay Clancy’s jury split eleven to one. The mistrial was declared. And instead of a resolution, the legal fight broke into three separate tracks — a potential retrial, two civil m…
Lindsay Clancy: The Defense Move That Could Shut Down a Retrial [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 20:13
What happens if the judge won’t end Lindsay Clancy’s case? Kevin Reddington had an answer ready before a retrial was even announced.After the mistrial, he asked for a fast hearing—and, if he lost that argument, jury sele…