Nick Reiner vs. Lindsay Clancy: What Makes Them Different?!

Nick Reiner vs. Lindsay Clancy: What Makes Them Different?!

Author: True Crime Today September 13, 2026 Duration: 46:05

Nick Reiner and Lindsay Clancy are both at the center of high-profile murder cases, and online arguments keep collapsing them into one question about mental illness. The legal records do not make them the same case. 

A Los Angeles County grand jury indicted Reiner on two murder counts in the deaths of his parents, Rob and Michele Reiner. He pleaded not guilty. The indictment also alleges multiple-murder and lying-in-wait special circumstances, and prosecutors say he personally used a knife. Years before the charges, Reiner spoke publicly about addiction, many treatment stays, homelessness, relapse, and destructive behavior during drug use, including wrecking his parents' guest house.
 
Clancy's Massachusetts trial centered on whether severe mental illness erased criminal responsibility. Her defense argued she suffered from postpartum psychosis when her three children died. Prosecutors disputed that and argued her actions were deliberate. Judge William Sullivan declared a mistrial September 4 after seven days of deliberations. Jurors who later spoke publicly described an 11-1 division favoring a not-guilty-by-reason-of-insanity verdict. 

The internet has turned that legal distinction into a loyalty test. A TikTok creator claimed he ended a $200,000 wedding after his fiancee expressed a different view of the Clancy case, then called her a monster. That story spread because the argument was no longer only about Lindsay Clancy. It became a judgment about the person sitting across from you. 

Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott, author of Nightbird, joins Tony Brueski to separate diagnosis from responsibility and public outrage from evidence. They examine why addiction history does not automatically answer a murder charge and why a psychosis defense does not erase the deaths at the center of a case. They also ask whether comparing defendants can become a shortcut that hides the facts a jury must decide. 

Reiner returns to court September 15. Clancy's prosecution remains pending after the mistrial. 

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod 

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

#NickReiner #LindsayClancy #HiddenKillers #ShavaunScott #LyingInWait #PostpartumPsychosis #Mistrial #MentalHealth #TrueCrimePodcast #CriminalJustice 


Each week, Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary cuts through the noise of the daily headlines to examine the darker stories unfolding in real time. Hosted by Tony Brueski and presented by True Crime Today, this isn't just a recap of events; it's a deep, analytical dive into the cases that dominate the news cycle, asking the difficult questions that often go unasked. You'll hear detailed commentary on ongoing trials, breaking developments in high-profile investigations, and discussions on the societal and psychological patterns that these crimes reveal. The podcast operates at the intersection of news and thoughtful analysis, providing context where there is often only sensation. Rather than simply presenting facts, Tony engages with the material, offering a perspective that challenges listeners to think critically about the true crime stories they believe they know. It’s for those who follow the news with a keen eye and want to understand the "why" behind the "what." Tune in for a sober, engaging conversation that treats these serious subjects with the depth they demand, making this a standout offering in the true crime genre for anyone seeking more than surface-level reporting.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 50

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Podcast Episodes
Farwell's Defense Claims THIS About Sandra Birchmore [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 20:59
The defense in the Matthew Farwell case is building its strategy around Sandra Birchmore's mental health records, her journals, and her history of instability. They want the jury to see a woman who killed herself. Prosec…
Wendi Adelson's Ex-Boyfriend Testified to WHAT Under Oath? [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 28:32
Five days before the murder, Wendi Adelson's boyfriend says she told him her brother had looked into hiring a hitman. The day before, she asked him about his Friday driving route near Dan Markel's house, then told him no…
Patrick Clancy's Lawyer Told Conspiracy Theorists What's Coming [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 12:25
Lindsay Clancy admitted through her defense that she killed her three children — Cora, Dawson, and Callan — in their Duxbury home in January 2023. The trial was solely about whether she was criminally responsible. It end…
Biggie's Case — What the LAPD Did to the Investigation [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 10:58
Every time a detective got close to solving the murder of Christopher Wallace, the LAPD pulled the plug. The first investigator followed the evidence to two of the department's own officers. His chief ordered him to stop…
Why Lindsay Clancy’s Case Is Farther From Over Than Ever [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 58:34
The trial ended. The case multiplied. Lindsay Clancy’s jury split eleven to one. The mistrial was declared. And instead of a resolution, the legal fight broke into three separate tracks — a potential retrial, two civil m…
Lindsay Clancy: The Defense Move That Could Shut Down a Retrial [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 20:13
What happens if the judge won’t end Lindsay Clancy’s case? Kevin Reddington had an answer ready before a retrial was even announced.After the mistrial, he asked for a fast hearing—and, if he lost that argument, jury sele…