One Juror Did WHAT During Lindsay Clancy's Deliberations?!

One Juror Did WHAT During Lindsay Clancy's Deliberations?!

Author: True Crime Today September 15, 2026 Duration: 13:34

Seven days. Twelve jurors. Seven weeks of testimony. Psychiatric experts on both sides. And the Lindsay Clancy murder trial at Plymouth Superior Court came down to one man who admitted he had reasonable doubt and still refused to vote for acquittal.

The jurors are speaking publicly for the first time. Foreperson Roni Carlson said the holdout told the room he had reasonable doubt about Clancy's guilt after watching a recorded interview played in evidence. Carlson began signing the verdict forms. Then the holdout reversed and said he would not change his position.

Other jurors said the holdout disregarded testimony explanations from nurses serving on the jury. Juror Paula Devlin called him arrogant and said he refused to engage with information that contradicted his position. The jury sent a formal note to Judge William Sullivan stating one member was not following the court's reasonable doubt instructions.

The psychological toll on the jury was severe. Jurors described being physically sick leaving the courthouse. The 911 call Patrick Clancy made after discovering what happened on January 24, 2023 left jurors in tears every night.

Lindsay Clancy was charged with first-degree murder in the deaths of Cora, Dawson, and Callan. Defense attorney Kevin Reddington conceded the killings and argued postpartum psychosis.

Former FBI Special Agent Robin Dreeke breaks down the behavioral dynamics of a holdout juror under group pressure, how trauma from evidence affects deliberation, and whether the system can call any jury fair when the evidence itself causes lasting psychological harm.

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#LindsayClancy #LindsayClancyTrial #HiddenKillers #HungJury #RobinDreeke #PlymouthSuperiorCourt #PostpartumPsychosis #KevinReddington #TrueCrime #TrueCrimePodcast


Each week, Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary cuts through the noise of the daily headlines to examine the darker stories unfolding in real time. Hosted by Tony Brueski and presented by True Crime Today, this isn't just a recap of events; it's a deep, analytical dive into the cases that dominate the news cycle, asking the difficult questions that often go unasked. You'll hear detailed commentary on ongoing trials, breaking developments in high-profile investigations, and discussions on the societal and psychological patterns that these crimes reveal. The podcast operates at the intersection of news and thoughtful analysis, providing context where there is often only sensation. Rather than simply presenting facts, Tony engages with the material, offering a perspective that challenges listeners to think critically about the true crime stories they believe they know. It’s for those who follow the news with a keen eye and want to understand the "why" behind the "what." Tune in for a sober, engaging conversation that treats these serious subjects with the depth they demand, making this a standout offering in the true crime genre for anyone seeking more than surface-level reporting.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 50

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Podcast Episodes
Farwell's Defense Claims THIS About Sandra Birchmore [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 20:59
The defense in the Matthew Farwell case is building its strategy around Sandra Birchmore's mental health records, her journals, and her history of instability. They want the jury to see a woman who killed herself. Prosec…
Wendi Adelson's Ex-Boyfriend Testified to WHAT Under Oath? [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 28:32
Five days before the murder, Wendi Adelson's boyfriend says she told him her brother had looked into hiring a hitman. The day before, she asked him about his Friday driving route near Dan Markel's house, then told him no…
Patrick Clancy's Lawyer Told Conspiracy Theorists What's Coming [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 12:25
Lindsay Clancy admitted through her defense that she killed her three children — Cora, Dawson, and Callan — in their Duxbury home in January 2023. The trial was solely about whether she was criminally responsible. It end…
Biggie's Case — What the LAPD Did to the Investigation [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 10:58
Every time a detective got close to solving the murder of Christopher Wallace, the LAPD pulled the plug. The first investigator followed the evidence to two of the department's own officers. His chief ordered him to stop…
Why Lindsay Clancy’s Case Is Farther From Over Than Ever [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 58:34
The trial ended. The case multiplied. Lindsay Clancy’s jury split eleven to one. The mistrial was declared. And instead of a resolution, the legal fight broke into three separate tracks — a potential retrial, two civil m…
Lindsay Clancy: The Defense Move That Could Shut Down a Retrial [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 20:13
What happens if the judge won’t end Lindsay Clancy’s case? Kevin Reddington had an answer ready before a retrial was even announced.After the mistrial, he asked for a fast hearing—and, if he lost that argument, jury sele…