Patrick Clancy's Atto rney Warned Accusers WHAT?!

Patrick Clancy's Atto rney Warned Accusers WHAT?!

Author: True Crime Today September 13, 2026 Duration: 27:45

Patrick Clancy's attorney says the social-media accusations against him crossed a line after Lindsay Clancy's murder trial ended in a September 4 mistrial. Howard Cooper's September 8 statement called the claims a defamation campaign, said law enforcement had been notified, and warned that legal consequences could follow. No public evidence has implicated Patrick in the deaths of his three children. 

That has not stopped strangers from dissecting his life. Patrick testified as the Commonwealth's first witness about Lindsay's decline, the events of January 24, 2023 and the devastating 911 call. He later moved to New York, remarried and tried to rebuild. Online, those choices became fuel for unsupported theories instead of evidence of a surviving parent trying to live after losing Cora, Dawson and Callan. 

Kevin Reddington added another layer after the mistrial. Asked about internet claims targeting Patrick, Lindsay's attorney said Patrick had not been accused by him. Reddington also said he did not dismiss internet investigators and remarked on how TikTok and Instagram users can ferret out facts and conduct their own investigations. Reddington's praise for online investigation lands inside an environment already treating speculation like proof. 

Tony Brueski brings retired FBI behavioral analyst Robin Dreeke and psychotherapist Shavaun Scott into the conversation. Dreeke examines how people turn fragments of behavior into a narrative of guilt. Scott looks at why remarriage, forgiveness and the outward appearance of grief become character tests for people watching from a distance. 

Patrick's lawyer has now put the accusers on notice. The harder question is whether the internet can recognize the difference between asking questions and inventing a case against someone. 

Listen Anywhere You Get Podcasts: https://pod.link/1655749292 

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod?sub_confirmation=1 

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ 

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ 
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod 
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod 

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice. 

#LindsayClancy #PatrickClancy #TrueCrime #RobinDreeke #ShavaunScott #HiddenKillers #Mistrial #ConspiracyTheories #Defamation #CourtroomCoverage 


Each week, Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary cuts through the noise of the daily headlines to examine the darker stories unfolding in real time. Hosted by Tony Brueski and presented by True Crime Today, this isn't just a recap of events; it's a deep, analytical dive into the cases that dominate the news cycle, asking the difficult questions that often go unasked. You'll hear detailed commentary on ongoing trials, breaking developments in high-profile investigations, and discussions on the societal and psychological patterns that these crimes reveal. The podcast operates at the intersection of news and thoughtful analysis, providing context where there is often only sensation. Rather than simply presenting facts, Tony engages with the material, offering a perspective that challenges listeners to think critically about the true crime stories they believe they know. It’s for those who follow the news with a keen eye and want to understand the "why" behind the "what." Tune in for a sober, engaging conversation that treats these serious subjects with the depth they demand, making this a standout offering in the true crime genre for anyone seeking more than surface-level reporting.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 50

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Podcast Episodes
Farwell's Defense Claims THIS About Sandra Birchmore [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 20:59
The defense in the Matthew Farwell case is building its strategy around Sandra Birchmore's mental health records, her journals, and her history of instability. They want the jury to see a woman who killed herself. Prosec…
Wendi Adelson's Ex-Boyfriend Testified to WHAT Under Oath? [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 28:32
Five days before the murder, Wendi Adelson's boyfriend says she told him her brother had looked into hiring a hitman. The day before, she asked him about his Friday driving route near Dan Markel's house, then told him no…
Patrick Clancy's Lawyer Told Conspiracy Theorists What's Coming [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 12:25
Lindsay Clancy admitted through her defense that she killed her three children — Cora, Dawson, and Callan — in their Duxbury home in January 2023. The trial was solely about whether she was criminally responsible. It end…
Biggie's Case — What the LAPD Did to the Investigation [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 10:58
Every time a detective got close to solving the murder of Christopher Wallace, the LAPD pulled the plug. The first investigator followed the evidence to two of the department's own officers. His chief ordered him to stop…
Why Lindsay Clancy’s Case Is Farther From Over Than Ever [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 58:34
The trial ended. The case multiplied. Lindsay Clancy’s jury split eleven to one. The mistrial was declared. And instead of a resolution, the legal fight broke into three separate tracks — a potential retrial, two civil m…
Lindsay Clancy: The Defense Move That Could Shut Down a Retrial [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 20:13
What happens if the judge won’t end Lindsay Clancy’s case? Kevin Reddington had an answer ready before a retrial was even announced.After the mistrial, he asked for a fast hearing—and, if he lost that argument, jury sele…