What D4VD Allegedly Did the Morning After Celeste Was Killed

What D4VD Allegedly Did the Morning After Celeste Was Killed

Author: True Crime Today May 10, 2026 Duration: 39:46

According to prosecutors, the morning after Celeste Rivas Hernandez was allegedly stabbed to death, David Anthony Burke ordered a shovel from Home Depot. Then chainsaws. Then a body bag. Then an inflatable pool — all allegedly under the fake name "Victoria Mendez." Then he allegedly gave a radio interview. That evening, he allegedly attended a party for his debut album. The album dropped two days later.

This week's Hidden Killers review brings together the most critical D4VD case conversations — the prosecution's nine-page filing that rewrote the public understanding of the timeline and the listener questions that erupted after it went public.

Burke has pleaded not guilty to first-degree murder with special circumstances, continuous sexual abuse of a child under fourteen, and unlawful mutilation of human remains. His defense maintains he is innocent. But what Beth Silverman laid out in the People's Brief describes an alleged pattern of behavior so deliberate it extends days beyond the killing itself. Prosecutors allege Burke texted Celeste's phone asking where she was — after she was allegedly already dead. They allege he drove to a remote area near Lake Cachuma three separate times. Blue plastic fragments found in Celeste's remains were reportedly matched to the pool by LAPD's forensic lab. Fifty-four search warrants were executed — a number that tells you this investigation reached far beyond one person.

Prosecutors allege Burke met Celeste online when she was eleven and that the sexual relationship began when she was thirteen. They say she was reported missing multiple times. They say law enforcement told Burke her age during a welfare check and he claimed he'd only met her once.

Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer breaks down what the evidence roadmap reveals about how prosecutors are building premeditation and consciousness of guilt. Robin Dreeke answers the questions listeners have been asking — about what allegedly happened in the weeks after, about friends and associates who reportedly noticed a smell and said nothing, and about every system that allegedly failed a fourteen-year-old girl before it was too late.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#D4VD #CelesteRivasHernandez #DavidAnthonyBurke #PeoplesBrief #BethSilverman #Premeditation #JusticeForCeleste #VictoriaMendez #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers


Each week, Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary cuts through the noise of the daily headlines to examine the darker stories unfolding in real time. Hosted by Tony Brueski and presented by True Crime Today, this isn't just a recap of events; it's a deep, analytical dive into the cases that dominate the news cycle, asking the difficult questions that often go unasked. You'll hear detailed commentary on ongoing trials, breaking developments in high-profile investigations, and discussions on the societal and psychological patterns that these crimes reveal. The podcast operates at the intersection of news and thoughtful analysis, providing context where there is often only sensation. Rather than simply presenting facts, Tony engages with the material, offering a perspective that challenges listeners to think critically about the true crime stories they believe they know. It’s for those who follow the news with a keen eye and want to understand the "why" behind the "what." Tune in for a sober, engaging conversation that treats these serious subjects with the depth they demand, making this a standout offering in the true crime genre for anyone seeking more than surface-level reporting.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary
Podcast Episodes
Kouri Richin’s Tried To Get Revenge On Everyone Exposing Her Crimes [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 29:02
Kouri Richins’ courtroom speech was forty minutes of love, forgiveness, and motherhood. The sentencing memo prosecutors filed tells the story of what she was actually doing from her jail cell — and when you put them side…
What Lead Did SLED Dismiss on the Day of the Murdaugh Killings? [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 17:44
The financial crimes carried the first conviction. Twelve hours of stolen money, defrauded clients, and a pattern of lies so deep the jury only needed three hours to decide. The South Carolina Supreme Court just said non…
Did Buster Murdaugh Just Turn on His Own Father? [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 17:04
Buster Murdaugh defended his father at trial, told the jury Alex couldn’t have done this, and then went silent for three years. No interviews. Almost no prison visits. A quiet wedding. A deliberate distance. Now that the…
Does South Carolina Really Think They Can Win Alex Murduagh Trial 2? [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 49:35
The South Carolina Supreme Court didn't just reverse Alex Murdaugh's conviction. It overruled one of its own prior decisions to do it. The court formally adopted the Fourth Circuit's three-step Cheek test for evaluating…
A Murdaugh Juror’s Doubts Scored Alex NEW TRIAL!! [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 49:35
A juror in Alex Murdaugh's double murder trial had questions about his guilt. She voted to convict anyway — after the Clerk of Court told the jury not to be fooled by the defense. All five South Carolina Supreme Court ju…