Criminal Law Fall Launch: Inchoate Crimes and Parties: Attempt, Solicitation, Conspiracy, Accomplice Liability, Pinkerton Liability, Withdrawal, and Merger

Criminal Law Fall Launch: Inchoate Crimes and Parties: Attempt, Solicitation, Conspiracy, Accomplice Liability, Pinkerton Liability, Withdrawal, and Merger

Author: The Law School of America September 5, 2026 Duration: 1:15:59

📘 FREE COMPANION STUDY GUIDE 📘
👉 CLICK HERE TO OPEN YOUR FREE STUDY GUIDE 👈
Turn this episode into an exam-ready study plan.

🎧 EPISODE SUMMARY 🎧Criminal liability can arise before, during, or around completion of an offense.

Key doctrines include:

  • Attempt.

  • Solicitation.

  • Conspiracy.

Attempt requires specific intent to commit the target offense plus acts beyond preparation.

For example, attempted murder requires intent to kill; recklessness is insufficient.

Attempt tests include:

  • Last-act.

  • Dangerous proximity.

  • Model Penal Code substantial step.

The last-act test requires conduct at the final step.

The dangerous-proximity test evaluates how close the defendant came to completion.

The unequivocality test requires conduct that unambiguously shows criminal purpose.

The MPC substantial-step test requires a substantial step strongly corroborating criminal purpose.

Factual impossibility is not a defense, whereas legal impossibility traditionally may be.

Abandonment is generally not recognized at common law once complete, though the MPC recognizes voluntary renunciation.

Solicitation occurs upon asking another to commit a crime with intent that it be committed.

Conspiracy requires an agreement and intent to achieve the unlawful objective, plus an overt act where required.

Common law uses a bilateral approach requiring two culpable parties, while the MPC allows a unilateral conspiracy.

Pinkerton liability holds conspirators liable for foreseeable co-conspirator crimes in furtherance of the conspiracy.

Withdrawal from a conspiracy does not erase past liability but may limit future crimes.

Attempt and solicitation merge into the completed offense, but conspiracy does not.

Accomplice liability requires intentional assistance or encouragement; mere presence or knowledge is insufficient.

An accessory after the fact assists a felon only after the crime is completed to hinder arrest or prosecution.

Each theory of criminal responsibility must be precisely identified.

ℹ️ INFORMATION, PRIVACY POLICY & TERMS OF USE ℹ️

The Podcast and Website Purpose
The Law School Podcast and 1L Study Aide webpage supplements law-school and Bar Exam study with strategies, condensed rules, quizzes, and flashcards.

Educational Disclaimer
Content is for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal advice, creates no attorney-client relationship, and does not guarantee law-school or Bar Exam success.

Privacy Policy

  • No account or login is required.
  • This webpage uses no forms or analytics to collect personal information.
  • Quiz and flashcard activity stays in your browser and may clear when local site data is removed.

Terms of Use
By using this webpage, you agree to use its content only for lawful, personal, noncommercial educational purposes. It supplements—not replaces—courses, textbooks, official materials, or qualified instruction.


Ever wondered how the law really works but felt intimidated by dense textbooks and jargon? Law School, from The Law School of America, is here to change that. This podcast approaches legal education like a series of engaging conversations, breaking down the foundational principles of the American legal system into clear, manageable segments. Each episode focuses on a specific concept or area, building your comprehension step-by-step without overwhelming you. You'll hear straightforward explanations that connect theory to real-world application, making complex topics accessible whether you're a student, a professional in a related field, or simply a curious citizen. The goal is to demystify the law, transforming it from an abstract subject into a practical understanding you can use. By consistently tuning in, you gradually construct a solid framework of legal knowledge. This isn't about quick tricks; it's about dedicated, cumulative learning. The structure of the podcast is designed for steady progress, allowing listeners to absorb information at their own pace and truly integrate it. Think of it as an audio companion for your intellectual journey into jurisprudence, offering clarity and insight one episode at a time.
Author: Language: en-us Episodes: 50

Law School
Podcast Episodes