"A high integrity/epistemics political machine?" by Raemon

"A high integrity/epistemics political machine?" by Raemon

Author: LessWrong December 17, 2025 Duration: 19:04
LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
TechnologyCulturePhilosophySocietySociety & Culture
I have goals that can only be reached via a powerful political machine. Probably a lot of other people around here share them. (Goals include “ensure no powerful dangerous AI get built”, “ensure governance of the US and world are broadly good / not decaying”, “have good civic discourse that plugs into said governance.”)

I think it’d be good if there was a powerful rationalist political machine to try to make those things happen. Unfortunately the naive ways of doing that would destroy the good things about the rationalist intellectual machine. This post lays out some thoughts on how to have a political machine with good epistemics and integrity.

Recently, I gave to the Alex Bores campaign. It turned out to raise a quite serious, surprising amount of money.

I donated to Alex Bores fairly confidently. A few years ago, I donated to Carrick Flynn, feeling kinda skeezy about it. Not because there's necessarily anything wrong with Carrick Flynn, but, because the process that generated "donate to Carrick Flynn" was a self-referential "well, he's an EA, so it's good if he's in office." (There might have been people with more info than that, but I didn’t hear much about [...]

---

Outline:

(02:32) The AI Safety Case

(04:27) Some reason things are hard

(04:37) Mutual Reputation Alliances

(05:25) People feel an incentive to gain power generally

(06:12) Private information is very relevant

(06:49) Powerful people can be vindictive

(07:12) Politics is broadly adversarial

(07:39) Lying and Misleadingness are contagious

(08:11) Politics is the Mind Killer / Hard Mode

(08:30) A high integrity political machine needs to work longterm, not just once

(09:02) Grift

(09:15) Passwords should be costly to fake

(10:08) Example solution: Private and/or Retrospective Watchdogs for Political Donations

(12:50) People in charge of PACs/similar needs good judgment

(14:07) Don't share reputation / Watchdogs shouldn't be an org

(14:46) Prediction markets for integrity violation

(16:00) LessWrong is for evaluation, and (at best) a very specific kind of rallying

---

First published:
December 14th, 2025

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/2pB3KAuZtkkqvTsKv/a-high-integrity-epistemics-political-machine

---



Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.


Dive into a stream of ideas where technology, culture, philosophy, and society intersect, all through the lens of the LessWrong (Curated & Popular) podcast. This isn't a traditional talk show with hosts, but rather a curated audio library of the most impactful writing from the LessWrong community. Each episode is a narration of a full post, selected for its high value and interesting arguments, focusing on pieces that have been formally curated or have garnered significant community approval. You'll hear clear, thoughtful readings of essays that tackle complex topics like artificial intelligence, rational thinking, moral philosophy, and the forces shaping our future. The audio format lets you absorb these dense, often paradigm-shifting concepts during a commute or a walk, turning written analysis into an immersive listening experience. This particular feed is deliberately selective, offering a manageable stream of the community's standout work. For those who want an even deeper dive into the discussion, there are broader feeds available. The LessWrong (Curated & Popular) podcast serves as an intellectual filter, delivering the signal through the noise and inviting you to engage with some of the most rigorously examined ideas on the internet.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

Official website RSS
apple_music
LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
Podcast Episodes
“Little Echo” by Zvi [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 4:08
I believe that we will win. An echo of an old ad for the 2014 US men's World Cup team. It did not win. I was in Berkeley for the 2025 Secular Solstice. We gather to sing and to reflect. The night's theme was the opposite…
“A Pragmatic Vision for Interpretability” by Neel Nanda [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:03:58
Executive Summary The Google DeepMind mechanistic interpretability team has made a strategic pivot over the past year, from ambitious reverse-engineering to a focus on pragmatic interpretability: Trying to directly solve…
“AI in 2025: gestalt” by technicalities [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 41:59
This is the editorial for this year's "Shallow Review of AI Safety". (It got long enough to stand alone.) Epistemic status: subjective impressions plus one new graph plus 300 links. Huge thanks to Jaeho Lee, Jaime Sevill…
“Eliezer’s Unteachable Methods of Sanity” by Eliezer Yudkowsky [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 16:13
"How are you coping with the end of the world?" journalists sometimes ask me, and the true answer is something they have no hope of understanding and I have no hope of explaining in 30 seconds, so I usually answer someth…
“An Ambitious Vision for Interpretability” by leogao [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 8:49
The goal of ambitious mechanistic interpretability (AMI) is to fully understand how neural networks work. While some have pivoted towards more pragmatic approaches, I think the reports of AMI's death have been greatly ex…
“MIRI’s 2025 Fundraiser” by alexvermeer [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 15:37
MIRI is running its first fundraiser in six years, targeting $6M. The first $1.6M raised will be matched 1:1 via an SFF grant. Fundraiser ends at midnight on Dec 31, 2025. Support our efforts to improve the conversation…
“The Boring Part of Bell Labs” by Elizabeth [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 25:57
It took me a long time to realize that Bell Labs was cool. You see, my dad worked at Bell Labs, and he has not done a single cool thing in his life except create me and bring a telescope to my third grade class. Nothing…

«1...5678910»