"Don’t Let LLMs Write For You" by JustisMills

"Don’t Let LLMs Write For You" by JustisMills

Author: LessWrong March 12, 2026 Duration: 5:53
Content note: nothing in this piece is a prank or jumpscare where I smirkingly reveal you've been reading AI prose all along.

It's easy to forget this in roarin’ 2026, but homo sapiens are the original vibers. Long before we adapt our behaviors or formal heuristics, human beings can sniff out something sus. And to most human beings, AI prose is something sus.

If you use AI to write something, people will know. Not everyone, but the people paying attention, who aren’t newcomers or distracted or intoxicated. And most of those people will judge you.

The Reasons

People may just be squicked out by AI, or lossily compress AI with crypto and assume you’re a “tech bro,” or think only uncreative idiots use AI at all. These are bad objections, and I don’t endorse them. But when I catch a whiff of LLM smell, I stop reading. I stop reading much faster than if I saw typos, or broken English, or disliked ideology. There are two reasons.

First, human writing is evidence of human thinking. If you try writing something you don’t understand well, it becomes immediately apparent; you end up writing a mess, and it stays a mess [...]

---

Outline:

(00:47) The Reasons

(03:39) Luddite! Moralizer!

The original text contained 1 footnote which was omitted from this narration.

---

First published:
March 10th, 2026

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/FCE6MeDzLEYKFPZX6/don-t-let-llms-write-for-you

---



Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.


Dive into a stream of ideas where technology, culture, philosophy, and society intersect, all through the lens of the LessWrong (Curated & Popular) podcast. This isn't a traditional talk show with hosts, but rather a curated audio library of the most impactful writing from the LessWrong community. Each episode is a narration of a full post, selected for its high value and interesting arguments, focusing on pieces that have been formally curated or have garnered significant community approval. You'll hear clear, thoughtful readings of essays that tackle complex topics like artificial intelligence, rational thinking, moral philosophy, and the forces shaping our future. The audio format lets you absorb these dense, often paradigm-shifting concepts during a commute or a walk, turning written analysis into an immersive listening experience. This particular feed is deliberately selective, offering a manageable stream of the community's standout work. For those who want an even deeper dive into the discussion, there are broader feeds available. The LessWrong (Curated & Popular) podcast serves as an intellectual filter, delivering the signal through the noise and inviting you to engage with some of the most rigorously examined ideas on the internet.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
Podcast Episodes
"My journey to the microwave alternate timeline" by Malmesbury [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 20:26
Cross-posted from Telescopic Turnip Recommended soundtrack for this post As we all know, the march of technological progress is best summarized by this meme from Linkedin: Inventors constantly come up with exciting new i…
"Stone Age Billionaire Can’t Words Good" by Eneasz [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 23:19
I was at the Pro-Billionaire march, unironically. Here's why, what happened there, and how I think it went. Me on the far left. From WSJ. I. Why? There's a genre of horror movie where a normal protagonist is going throug…
"On Goal-Models" by Richard_Ngo [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 6:36
I'd like to reframe our understanding of the goals of intelligent agents to be in terms of goal-models rather than utility functions. By a goal-model I mean the same type of thing as a world-model, only representing how…
"Post-AGI Economics As If Nothing Ever Happens" by Jan_Kulveit [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 16:38
When economists think and write about the post-AGI world, they often rely on the implicit assumption that parameters may change, but fundamentally, structurally, not much happens. And if it does, it's maybe one or two em…