"How I stopped being sure LLMs are just making up their internal experience (but the topic is still confusing)" by Kaj_Sotala

"How I stopped being sure LLMs are just making up their internal experience (but the topic is still confusing)" by Kaj_Sotala

Author: LessWrong December 16, 2025 Duration: 52:20
How it started

I used to think that anything that LLMs said about having something like subjective experience or what it felt like on the inside was necessarily just a confabulated story. And there were several good reasons for this.

First, something that Peter Watts mentioned in an early blog post about LaMDa stuck with me, back when Blake Lemoine got convinced that LaMDa was conscious. Watts noted that LaMDa claimed not to have just emotions, but to have exactly the same emotions as humans did - and that it also claimed to meditate, despite no equivalents of the brain structures that humans use to meditate. It would be immensely unlikely for an entirely different kind of mind architecture to happen to hit upon exactly the same kinds of subjective experiences as humans - especially since relatively minor differences in brains already cause wide variation among humans.

And since LLMs were text predictors, there was a straightforward explanation for where all those consciousness claims were coming from. They were trained on human text, so then they would simulate a human, and one of the things humans did was to claim consciousness. Or if the LLMs were told they were [...]

---

Outline:

(00:14) How it started

(05:03) Case 1: talk about refusals

(10:15) Case 2: preferences for variety

(14:40) Case 3: Emerging Introspective Awareness?

(20:04) Case 4: Felt sense-like descriptions in LLM self-reports

(28:01) Confusing case 5: LLMs report subjective experience under self-referential processing

(31:39) Confusing case 6: what can LLMs remember from their training?

(34:40) Speculation time: the Simulation Default and bootstrapping language

(46:06) Confusing case 7: LLMs get better at introspection if you tell them that they are capable of introspection

(48:34) Where we're at now

(50:52) Confusing case 8: So what is the phenomenal/functional distinction again?

The original text contained 2 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.

---

First published:
December 13th, 2025

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/hopeRDfyAgQc4Ez2g/how-i-stopped-being-sure-llms-are-just-making-up-their

---



Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---

Images from the article:

Comparison of AI responses showing default versus injected

Dive into a stream of ideas where technology, culture, philosophy, and society intersect, all through the lens of the LessWrong (Curated & Popular) podcast. This isn't a traditional talk show with hosts, but rather a curated audio library of the most impactful writing from the LessWrong community. Each episode is a narration of a full post, selected for its high value and interesting arguments, focusing on pieces that have been formally curated or have garnered significant community approval. You'll hear clear, thoughtful readings of essays that tackle complex topics like artificial intelligence, rational thinking, moral philosophy, and the forces shaping our future. The audio format lets you absorb these dense, often paradigm-shifting concepts during a commute or a walk, turning written analysis into an immersive listening experience. This particular feed is deliberately selective, offering a manageable stream of the community's standout work. For those who want an even deeper dive into the discussion, there are broader feeds available. The LessWrong (Curated & Popular) podcast serves as an intellectual filter, delivering the signal through the noise and inviting you to engage with some of the most rigorously examined ideas on the internet.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
Podcast Episodes
"My Willing Complicity In “Human Rights Abuse”" by AlphaAndOmega [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 18:47
Note on AI usage: As is my norm, I use LLMs for proof reading, editing, feedback and research purposes. This essay started off as an entirely human written draft, and went through multiple cycles of iteration. The primar…
"Don’t Let LLMs Write For You" by JustisMills [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 5:53
Content note: nothing in this piece is a prank or jumpscare where I smirkingly reveal you've been reading AI prose all along. It's easy to forget this in roarin’ 2026, but homo sapiens are the original vibers. Long befor…
"Thoughts on the Pause AI protest" by philh [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 11:12
On Saturday (Feb 28, 2026) I attended my first ever protest. It was jointly organized by PauseAI, Pull the Plug and a handful of other groups I forget. I have mixed feelings about it. To be clear about where I stand: I b…
"Less Dead" by Aurelia [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 14:11
Come with me if you want to live. – The Terminator 'Close enough' only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades. – Traditional After 10 years of research my company, Nectome, has created a new method for whole-body, whole-…
"Gemma Needs Help" by Anna Soligo [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 15:00
This work was done with William Saunders and Vlad Mikulik as part of the Anthropic Fellows programme. The full write-up is available here. Thanks to Arthur Conmy, Neel Nanda, Josh Engels, Dillon Plunkett, Tim Hua and man…
"On Independence Axiom" by Ihor Kendiukhov [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 44:59
The Fifth Fourth Postulate of Decision Theory In 1820, the Hungarian mathematician Farkas Bolyai wrote a desperate letter to his son János, who had become consumed by the same problem that had haunted his father for deca…
"Solar storms" by Croissanthology [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 23:22
Most of civilization's electricity is generated far off-site from where it's delivered. This is because you don't want to be running and refueling coal/gas/nuclear plants inside cities, hydraulic/wind power can't be move…
"Schelling Goodness, and Shared Morality as a Goal" by Andrew_Critch [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:14:50
Also available in markdown at theMultiplicity.ai/blog/schelling-goodness. This post explores a notion I'll call Schelling goodness. Claims of Schelling goodness are not first-order moral verdicts like "X is good" or "X i…