"You’re an AI Expert – Not an Influencer" by Max Winga

"You’re an AI Expert – Not an Influencer" by Max Winga

Author: LessWrong February 20, 2026 Duration: 11:39
Your hot takes are killing your credibility.

Prior to my last year at ControlAI, I was a physicist working on technical AI safety research. Like many of those warning about the dangers of AI, I don’t come from a background in public communications, but I’ve quickly learned some important rules. The #1 rule that I’ve seen far too many others in this field break is that You’re an AI Expert - Not an Influencer.

When communicating to an audience, your persona is one of two broad categories: Influencer or Professional

  • Influencers are individuals who build an audience around themselves as a person. Their currency is popularity and their audience values them for who they are and what they believe, not just what they know.
  • Professionals are individuals who appear in the public eye as representatives of their expertise or organization. Their currency is credibility and their audience values them for what they know and what they represent, not who they are.
So… let's say you’re trying to be a public figure making a difference about AI risk. You’ve been on a podcast or two, maybe even on The News. You might work at an AI policy organization, or [...]

---

Outline:

(00:11) Your hot takes are killing your credibility.

(02:10) STOP - What Would Media Training Steve do?

(05:22) Dont Feed Your Enemies

(07:07) The Luxury of Not Being a Politician

(09:33) So How Do You Deal With Politics?

(10:58) Conclusion

---

First published:
February 17th, 2026

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/hCtm7rxeXaWDvrh4j/you-re-an-ai-expert-not-an-influencer

---



Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---

Images from the article:

Four-panel meme showing crowd's reaction split between agreement and anger.Apple Podcasts and Spotify do not show images in the episode description. Try Pocket Casts, or another podcast app.


Dive into a stream of ideas where technology, culture, philosophy, and society intersect, all through the lens of the LessWrong (Curated & Popular) podcast. This isn't a traditional talk show with hosts, but rather a curated audio library of the most impactful writing from the LessWrong community. Each episode is a narration of a full post, selected for its high value and interesting arguments, focusing on pieces that have been formally curated or have garnered significant community approval. You'll hear clear, thoughtful readings of essays that tackle complex topics like artificial intelligence, rational thinking, moral philosophy, and the forces shaping our future. The audio format lets you absorb these dense, often paradigm-shifting concepts during a commute or a walk, turning written analysis into an immersive listening experience. This particular feed is deliberately selective, offering a manageable stream of the community's standout work. For those who want an even deeper dive into the discussion, there are broader feeds available. The LessWrong (Curated & Popular) podcast serves as an intellectual filter, delivering the signal through the noise and inviting you to engage with some of the most rigorously examined ideas on the internet.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
Podcast Episodes
"My Willing Complicity In “Human Rights Abuse”" by AlphaAndOmega [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 18:47
Note on AI usage: As is my norm, I use LLMs for proof reading, editing, feedback and research purposes. This essay started off as an entirely human written draft, and went through multiple cycles of iteration. The primar…
"Don’t Let LLMs Write For You" by JustisMills [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 5:53
Content note: nothing in this piece is a prank or jumpscare where I smirkingly reveal you've been reading AI prose all along. It's easy to forget this in roarin’ 2026, but homo sapiens are the original vibers. Long befor…
"Thoughts on the Pause AI protest" by philh [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 11:12
On Saturday (Feb 28, 2026) I attended my first ever protest. It was jointly organized by PauseAI, Pull the Plug and a handful of other groups I forget. I have mixed feelings about it. To be clear about where I stand: I b…
"Less Dead" by Aurelia [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 14:11
Come with me if you want to live. – The Terminator 'Close enough' only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades. – Traditional After 10 years of research my company, Nectome, has created a new method for whole-body, whole-…
"Gemma Needs Help" by Anna Soligo [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 15:00
This work was done with William Saunders and Vlad Mikulik as part of the Anthropic Fellows programme. The full write-up is available here. Thanks to Arthur Conmy, Neel Nanda, Josh Engels, Dillon Plunkett, Tim Hua and man…
"On Independence Axiom" by Ihor Kendiukhov [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 44:59
The Fifth Fourth Postulate of Decision Theory In 1820, the Hungarian mathematician Farkas Bolyai wrote a desperate letter to his son János, who had become consumed by the same problem that had haunted his father for deca…
"Solar storms" by Croissanthology [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 23:22
Most of civilization's electricity is generated far off-site from where it's delivered. This is because you don't want to be running and refueling coal/gas/nuclear plants inside cities, hydraulic/wind power can't be move…
"Schelling Goodness, and Shared Morality as a Goal" by Andrew_Critch [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:14:50
Also available in markdown at theMultiplicity.ai/blog/schelling-goodness. This post explores a notion I'll call Schelling goodness. Claims of Schelling goodness are not first-order moral verdicts like "X is good" or "X i…