Episode 83 - 4 critiques to the idea of “goal setting” in companies

Episode 83 - 4 critiques to the idea of “goal setting” in companies

Author: Bart Vanderhaegen June 11, 2021 Duration: 11:08

A little upfront warning. In a good Popperian sense: a critique is aimed at improving something, not at throwing it out. I am not suggesting to NOT set goals.

Anyway here are the 4 critiques

  1. The future is unpredictable
    1. Setting a goal is kinda predicting
  2. Sticking to the goal is counterproductive
    1. People spend time energy and ideas trying to pursue something that in the end will have to be changed once it’s really really clear that it cannot be obtained
  3. The goal doesn’t contain the ideas you need to make progress
    1. The goal doesn’t contain the info on how to make progress
    2. Example: I want to loose 10 pounds.
      1. Nothing in that statement tells me how to approach and what to do and why
  4. A goal tends to distract attention from making real progress now
    1. It is much easier to disagree about something in the future than about something in the present (many more options, far less testable, also less concrete)
    2. The goal should serve as a means to criticise what you are doing now
    3. What you want to do now (and how and why) is much more important, and there should the focus be on. Goals can be used as criticism
    4. Goals sometimes serve as religions that allow to forget about the question “what to do next?”. As long as we can indulge in the beauty of our long term destination, that seems to serve as a temporary relief. However, temporary reliefs are not what we are after, we are after figuring out what to do next (and how and why)

Bart Vanderhaegen hosts Rapid Idea Improvement, a podcast that digs into a powerful and practical question: how do ideas actually get better? Instead of staying in the abstract, it applies the principles of knowledge growth-particularly those from thinkers like Karl Popper and David Deutsch-to the messy, real-world domains of business, management, and economics, while also reaching into fields like physics for broader insight. Each episode is an exploration of critical rationalism in action, examining how we can systematically criticize and refine our thinking to solve problems more effectively. You’ll hear discussions that treat business challenges not as puzzles with fixed answers, but as opportunities for evolutionary idea improvement, where bold conjectures and rigorous error-correction drive progress. This isn't about motivational tips or surface-level analysis; it's about building a deeper framework for understanding how knowledge expands, and then using that framework to make your own thinking more potent and adaptable. The conversations in this podcast are for anyone who suspects that the way we approach problems-in leadership, strategy, or innovation-can be fundamentally upgraded. By weaving together epistemology with practical application, the show aims to provide listeners with a genuinely useful toolkit for accelerating the development of their most important ideas.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

Rapid Idea Improvement
Podcast Episodes
Episode 145 : Why is epistemology relevant and important ? [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 9:01
Epistemology is relevant when explaining *any* human activity, as it is a better/ deeper explanation than explanations at the level of behaviours (actions) or personality (assessments of persons as a whole)
Episode 144 : on the use of KPIs [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 12:36
Key aspects discussed related to how companies typically use KPIs Start from the KPI and not from the problem and solution (for which the KPI was supposed to be an indicator) Corrective actions are parochial and without…
Episode 140: The problem with problem solving [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 12:36
It is not contested that managers rely on their teams to get problems solved. However, in practise this turns out less easy than stated here. I go into some of the reasons why it is not trivial and concrete ways for impr…
Episode 137 - A critique of the Lencioni pyramid in teamwork [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 6:47
The natural state of any relationship is that fact that ideas differ. That is not “a shame” … or a proof that there is distrust. It is just the natural starting position. If it were a proof of distrust, then the first st…