Episode 103: Medical Hypotheses

Episode 103: Medical Hypotheses

Author: Tom Chivers and Stuart Ritchie August 4, 2026 Duration: 1:16:07

It sounds like a good idea in theory: a non-peer-reviewed scientific journal dedicated to pure scientific creativity. Send in your craziest hypotheses and as long as they’re original ideas, the editor will publish them, and let them inspire the readers.

That’s the journal Medical Hypotheses—or, it was. In this episode we discuss some of the maddest papers they ever published, including the one about how wearing heeled shoes causes schizophrenia and an astonishing idea about why humans get acne, and then discuss how the whole thing went wrong.

Show notes

* “Withdrawn” 2009 Duesberg et al. paper on HIV-AIDS in South Africa

* Flensmark (2004) on heeled footwear and schizophrenia

* Neuroskeptic’s 2019 investigation into Flensmark

* Expressen interview with Flensmark (auto-translated)

* 2008 letter proposing ejaculation as a treatment for nasal congestion

* Notorious 2007 Down syndrome paper

* Ben Goldacre’s piece on it

* Judith Rich Harris (2006) on parental selection and human hairlessness

* 2014 paper arguing van Gogh had acute porphyria

* 2022 paper arguing van Gogh had vestibular migraine instead

* “Why do humans get acne? A hypothesis” (2020)

* 2024 paper on dummies/pacifiers and SIDS

* The original 2013 Brainspotting paper

* 2024 Brainspotting debunking in the same journal

* “Medical Hypotheses RIP” from sacked editor Bruce Charlton

* Charlton’s earlier piece on the journal’s philosophy

* 1991 paper on the inflammation–depression hypothesis

* 2004 paper on the mitochondrial hypothesis for Alzheimer’s

* 2005 gut microbiome/brain paper

* 2017 paper “On human parthenogenesis”

Credits

The Science Fictions podcast is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions.



This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.com/subscribe

Every week, Tom Chivers and Stuart Ritchie pull apart the biggest arguments and most confusing claims making headlines. Science Fictions isn't just about celebrating breakthroughs; it's a necessary dive into the messy, contested, and often surprising realities of how science actually works. You'll hear them unpack heated debates, examine questionable studies, and explore why even solid research can sometimes lead to public confusion. This podcast serves as a guide through the noise, separating compelling evidence from overblown narratives. Each episode feels like a conversation with two deeply informed friends who aren't afraid to ask tough questions, offering clarity on topics that matter. For anyone curious about the stories behind the science headlines, this is an essential listen. Tune in for thoughtful analysis that goes beyond the press release, grounded in a genuine fascination with how we know what we know.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 50

Science Fictions
Podcast Episodes
Episode 84: Brain training [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:07:04
5—6—3—4—3—1—7—2In the first episode under our new podcast name (it’s now the Science Fictions podcast!), we ask whatever happened to all those games that claimed to tell you your “brain age”—games that turned into a whol…
Episode 83: Dark matter and dark energy [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 56:41
Where is most of the universe? And why don't we know yet? Yes—we’re talking about dark matter and dark energy, the mysterious stuff that’s predicted by physical theory, but which still remains elusive in experiments.Afte…
Episode 82: Paper mills [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 47:07
In our last standard episode, we talked about retraction—removing papers from the scientific literature. Well, it turns out there’s an awful lot of retraction to do, in large part due to paper mills. These are fraudulent…
Unpaywalled: Diversity training [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:05:08
We’re very sorry about the disrupted service over this summer! It’s been hectic with work and a house move and various things. To tide you over, here’s a formerly paywalled episode: our very first one.…If you’ve ever don…
Episode 81: Retraction [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:11:53
RETRACTED // In this episode of The Studies Show, Tom and Stuart discuss retraction, the process of removing articles from the scientific record. How often is it due to fraud? How many papers get retracted—and is the num…
Episode 80: Mindfulness meditation [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:04:59
Pay attention. Focus on your breathing. Live in the moment. Accept yourself. Do you have a self? Focus on that self. And so on. This is, of course, the practice of mindfulness meditation, which seems to be everywhere: in…
Episode 79: Cancer rates [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 52:11
Are cancer rates going up or down? It seems like depending on where you look, you’ll find different answers to the question. What’s going on here — have some writers just got it completely wrong? Is it something to do wi…
Episode 78: Worm wars and mouth bacteria [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:15:56
Seconds out! Round one! Ding ding! And other boxing terms. We’ve found a topic on which Tom and Stuart actually disagree. Kind of. In this episode of The Studies Show, they use the examples of “the worm wars” (does dewor…
Paid-only Episode 21: Psychological sex differences [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 10:31
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.comInspired by a new Nature paper on how the “maths gap” emerges between girls and boys in school, Tom and Stuart look into the ev…
Episode 77: Anti-ageing, part 1 [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:05:46
Whether it’s people giving themselves goat blood transfusions in an effort to maintain their youth, or yet another influencer telling you to buy XYZ miracle supplements, anti-ageing is big business. In the first part of…