Dept. of Ed. v. Brown & Biden v. Nebraska - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

Dept. of Ed. v. Brown & Biden v. Nebraska - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

Author: The Federalist Society April 18, 2023 Duration: 42:20
On February 28, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in two cases challenging the Biden Administration's student loans forgiveness program: Board of Education v. Brown and Biden v. Nebraska.

In August 2022, the Biden Administration's Department of Education announced plans to forgive up to $20,000 in federal student loans for borrowers who qualified. In order to do this, the DOE relied on the HEROES Act, which allows the government to modify student loans, among other things, during a national emergency.

Both cases challenge this action. Biden v. Nebraska involves a challenge to the Executive action from six states who contend they will suffer direct harm based on a loss of tax revenue. In Department of Education v. Brown, two individual borrowers, one of whom has loans that are fully intelligible for forgiveness under the program, and one of whose loans only qualify for part of the maximum relief possible, also challenge the legitimacy of the program.

The Court is faced with two questions in both cases: first, do the challengers, whether they be the states or the individual borrowers, have standing to sue? The Biden administration contends neither of the respondents possess standing. Second, assuming the Court decides there is standing to sue, the Court will face the question “Does the plan exceed the statutory authority available to the Secretary of Education, and adopted in a procedurally proper manner?”

We will break down and analyze how oral argument went in both cases in this program.

Featuring:
Mark Chenoweth, President and General Counsel, New Civil Liberties Alliance

Tuning into the Supreme Court's docket can feel like deciphering a complex code, but SCOTUScast breaks down the arguments and decisions as they happen. Produced by The Federalist Society, this podcast delivers timely, expert analysis from legal scholars and practitioners immediately after oral arguments or when opinions are released. Each episode focuses on a specific case, cutting through the legal jargon to explain the core principles at stake, the questions posed by the justices, and the potential ramifications of the Court's rulings. You'll hear clear, substantive commentary that prioritizes understanding over advocacy, as the Society itself does not take positions on the issues discussed. The goal is to provide listeners with the intellectual tools to engage with these pivotal moments in law. Whether a landmark ruling on constitutional rights or a nuanced interpretation of statutory law, this audio series treats each development with the depth it deserves. For anyone following the judicial branch-from students and attorneys to engaged citizens-this podcast serves as an essential, real-time guide to the nation's highest court, fostering a more informed and thoughtful public discourse.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 50

SCOTUScast
Podcast Episodes
Bartenwerfer v. Buckley - Post-Decision SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 28:06
On February 22, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Bartenwerfer v. Buckley. At issue was whether a debtor is liable for a debt incurred by her partner’s fraud and if she can discharge that debt in bankruptcy, regardl…
Yegiazaryan v. Smagin - Post-Argument SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 44:26
On April 25, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Yegiazaryan v. Smagin. At issue is whether a foreign plaintiff states a cognizable civil claim under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act when it su…
Groff v. DeJoy - Post-Argument SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 27:01
On April 18, the Court heard oral argument in Groff v. Dejoy and is set to address two issues concerning the protections provided employees who seek to practice their religious beliefs in the context of the workplace. Th…
Percoco v. United States - Post-Decision SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 21:21
On May 11, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Percoco v. United States. Justice Scalia once commented “[t]hough it consists of only 28 words, the [honest services] statute has been invoked to impose criminal penaltie…
Samia v. United States - Post-Argument SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 16:46
On March 29, 2023, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Samia v. United States. The Court considered whether the admission of a codefendant’s redacted out-of-court confession that incriminates the defendant due to it…
United States v. Hansen - Post-Argument SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 42:21
On March 27, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. Hansen. At issue in Hansen is whether 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iv) and (B)(i), a federal criminal statute that prohibits encouraging or inducing unla…
Polselli v. Internal Revenue Service - Post-Decision SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 20:35
On May 18, 2023, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Polselli v. Internal Revenue Service. At issue was how much authority the IRS has (balanced against privacy rights) to seek records from third-party recordkeepers w…
Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi - Post-Argument SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 31:30
On November 4, 2022, the Supreme Court granted cert in Amgen Inc. v. Sanofi, a patent infringement case that involves the application of the statutory enablement requirement of Section 112 of the patent laws to what is r…
Axon v. Federal Trade Commission - Post-Decision SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 24:45
On April 14, 2023, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission. At issue was whether Congress stripped federal district courts of jurisdiction over constitutional challenges t…