FDA v. AHM - Post-Decision SCOTUScast

FDA v. AHM - Post-Decision SCOTUScast

Author: The Federalist Society August 21, 2024 Duration: 23:36
On June 13, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Food and Drug Administration v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine holding that the plaintiffs lacked Article III standing to challenge the Food and Drug Administration’s regulatory actions regarding mifepristone.
Join us to hear our panel break down the decision and discuss its potential ramifications.

Featuring:
Adam Unikowsky, Partner, Jenner & Block LLP
Megan M. Wold, Partner, Cooper & Kirk
(Moderator) Prof. Teresa Stanton Collett, Professor and Director, Prolife Center, University of St. Thomas School of Law

Tuning into the Supreme Court's docket can feel like deciphering a complex code, but SCOTUScast breaks down the arguments and decisions as they happen. Produced by The Federalist Society, this podcast delivers timely, expert analysis from legal scholars and practitioners immediately after oral arguments or when opinions are released. Each episode focuses on a specific case, cutting through the legal jargon to explain the core principles at stake, the questions posed by the justices, and the potential ramifications of the Court's rulings. You'll hear clear, substantive commentary that prioritizes understanding over advocacy, as the Society itself does not take positions on the issues discussed. The goal is to provide listeners with the intellectual tools to engage with these pivotal moments in law. Whether a landmark ruling on constitutional rights or a nuanced interpretation of statutory law, this audio series treats each development with the depth it deserves. For anyone following the judicial branch-from students and attorneys to engaged citizens-this podcast serves as an essential, real-time guide to the nation's highest court, fostering a more informed and thoughtful public discourse.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

SCOTUScast
Podcast Episodes
Garland v. Cargill - Post-Argument SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 47:11
On February 28, 2024, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Garland v. Cargill. The Court considered whether bump stocks are considered "machineguns" as defined by Title 26 of the United States Code.Please join us as…
Trump v. Anderson - Post-Decision SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 17:20
On March 4, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Trump v. Anderson. At issue was whether the Colorado Supreme Court erred in ordering former President Donald Trump excluded from the 2024 presidential primary ball…
Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, CA - Post-Argument SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 34:05
On January 9, 2024, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, CA. The Court considered whether a building-permit exaction is exempt from the unconstitutional-conditions doctrine as appli…
SEC v. Jarkesy - Post-Argument SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 29:13
On November 29, 2023, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy. The Court considered three questions – (1) Whether statutory provisions that empower the Securities and Exchan…
Moore v. United States - Post-Argument SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 27:52
On December 5, 2023, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Moore v. United States. The Court considered whether the 16th Amendment authorizes Congress to tax unrealized sums without apportionment among the states. Joi…
Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P. - Post-Argument SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 34:18
On December 4, 2023, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P. The Court considered whether as part of a plan of reorganization under a Chapter 11 bankruptcy, if the Bankruptcy Code author…
United States v. Rahimi - Post-Argument SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 36:19
On November 7, 2023, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in United States v. Rahimi. The Court considered whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), prohibiting the possession of firearms by persons subject to domestic-violen…
Bartenwerfer v. Buckley - Post-Decision SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 28:06
On February 22, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Bartenwerfer v. Buckley. At issue was whether a debtor is liable for a debt incurred by her partner’s fraud and if she can discharge that debt in bankruptcy, regardl…