Gonzalez v. Google LLC - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

Gonzalez v. Google LLC - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

Author: The Federalist Society April 12, 2023 Duration: 41:15
On February 21, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Gonzalez v. Google LLC.

After U.S. citizen Nohemi Gonzalez was killed by a terrorist attack in Paris, France, in 2015, Gonzalez’s father filed an action against Google, Twitter, and Facebook. Mr. Gonzalez claimed that Google aided and abetted international terrorism by allowing ISIS to use YouTube for recruiting and promulgating its message. At issue is the platform’s use of algorithms that suggest additional content based on users’ viewing history. Additionally, Gonzalez claims the tech companies failed to take meaningful action to counteract ISIS’ efforts on their platforms.

The district court granted Google’s motion to dismiss the claim based on Section 230(c)(1) of the Communications Decency Act, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed. The question now facing the Supreme Court is: does Section 230 immunize interactive computer services when they make targeted recommendations of information provided by another information content provider, or only limit the liability of interactive computer services when they engage in traditional editorial functions (such as deciding whether to display or withdraw) with regard to such information?

Join us as Erik Jaffe breaks down the oral argument.

Featuring:
Erik S. Jaffe, Partner, Schaerr | Jaffe LLP

Tuning into the Supreme Court's docket can feel like deciphering a complex code, but SCOTUScast breaks down the arguments and decisions as they happen. Produced by The Federalist Society, this podcast delivers timely, expert analysis from legal scholars and practitioners immediately after oral arguments or when opinions are released. Each episode focuses on a specific case, cutting through the legal jargon to explain the core principles at stake, the questions posed by the justices, and the potential ramifications of the Court's rulings. You'll hear clear, substantive commentary that prioritizes understanding over advocacy, as the Society itself does not take positions on the issues discussed. The goal is to provide listeners with the intellectual tools to engage with these pivotal moments in law. Whether a landmark ruling on constitutional rights or a nuanced interpretation of statutory law, this audio series treats each development with the depth it deserves. For anyone following the judicial branch-from students and attorneys to engaged citizens-this podcast serves as an essential, real-time guide to the nation's highest court, fostering a more informed and thoughtful public discourse.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

SCOTUScast
Podcast Episodes
SEC v. Cochran - Post-Argument SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 28:40
On November 7, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Michelle Cochran v. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. In April 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) brought an enforcement action ag…
SFFA v. Harvard - Post-Argument SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:00:08
On October 31, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court heard Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College (and Students for Fair Admissions Inc. v. University of North Carolina).In perhaps the most an…
National Pork Producers Council v. Ross - Post-Argument SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 19:52
In National Pork Producers Council v. Ross, the Supreme Court will address the dormant commerce clause in the context of a California law regarding the housing of farm animals. Specifically, the Court will decide "whethe…
Merrill v. Milligan - Post-Argument SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 55:59
On October 4, 2022 the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral argument in Merrill v. Milligan.Following the 2020 Census, the Alabama Legislature redrew its congressional district lines to account for shifts in the state’s populat…
Delaware v. Pennsylvania and Wisconsin - Post-Argument SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 35:18
Millions of dollars are at stake in a dispute over whether uncashed MoneyGrams qualify as “a money order, traveler’s check, or other similar written instrument (other than a third party bank check) on which a banking or…
Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency - Post-Argument SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:05:29
One of the longest-standing environmental law challenges is how to define the scope of waters regulated under the Clean Water Act known as “waters of the United States” (WOTUS). After decades of regulatory uncertainty, t…
West Virginia v. EPA - Post-Decision SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 45:27
On June 30, 2022, the Supreme Court decided West Virginia v. EPA. In a 6-3 decision, the Court held that EPA exceeded its authority under Clean Air Act Section 111 when it issued the 2015 Clean Power Plan, which sought t…