SEC v. Jarkesy - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

SEC v. Jarkesy - Post-Argument SCOTUScast

Author: The Federalist Society January 11, 2024 Duration: 29:13
On November 29, 2023, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jarkesy. The Court considered three questions – (1) Whether statutory provisions that empower the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to initiate and adjudicate administrative enforcement proceedings seeking civil penalties violate the Seventh Amendment; (2) Whether statutory provisions that authorize the SEC to choose to enforce the securities laws through an agency adjudication instead of filing a district court action violate the nondelegation doctrine; (3) Whether Congress violated Article II by granting for-cause removal protection to administrative law judges in agencies whose heads enjoy for-cause removal protection.

Join us as we break down and analyze how oral argument went before the Court.

Featuring:
Margaret A. Little, Senior Litigation Counsel, New Civil Liberties Alliance

Tuning into the Supreme Court's docket can feel like deciphering a complex code, but SCOTUScast breaks down the arguments and decisions as they happen. Produced by The Federalist Society, this podcast delivers timely, expert analysis from legal scholars and practitioners immediately after oral arguments or when opinions are released. Each episode focuses on a specific case, cutting through the legal jargon to explain the core principles at stake, the questions posed by the justices, and the potential ramifications of the Court's rulings. You'll hear clear, substantive commentary that prioritizes understanding over advocacy, as the Society itself does not take positions on the issues discussed. The goal is to provide listeners with the intellectual tools to engage with these pivotal moments in law. Whether a landmark ruling on constitutional rights or a nuanced interpretation of statutory law, this audio series treats each development with the depth it deserves. For anyone following the judicial branch-from students and attorneys to engaged citizens-this podcast serves as an essential, real-time guide to the nation's highest court, fostering a more informed and thoughtful public discourse.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

SCOTUScast
Podcast Episodes
Cameron v. EMW Women's Surgical Center - Post-Decision SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 22:01
On March 3, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Cameron v. EMW Women's Surgical Center. Writing for the 8-1 majority, Justice Samuel Alito explained how the the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit erred in denyi…
United States v. Tsarnaev - Post-Decision SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 10:05
On March 4, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court decided United States v. Tsarnaev. In a 6-3 decision, the Court reversed the judgment of the U.S. Court of the Appeals for the First Circuit, holding that the court improperly vac…
Carson v. Makin - Post-Decision SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 40:04
On June 21, 2022, the Supreme Court decided Carson v. Makin. In a 6-3 opinion, the Court reversed and remanded the judgment of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit. The Court held that Maine's "nonsectarian" r…
Patel v. Garland - Post-Decision SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 13:17
On May 16, 2022 the Court decided Patel v. Garland, holding that Federal courts lack jurisdiction to review facts found as part of any judgment relating to the granting of discretionary relief in immigration proceedings…
Golan v. Saada - Post-Decision SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 11:15
On June 15, 2022 the Court decided Golan v. Saada, holding that a court is not categorically required to examine all possible ameliorative measures before denying a Hague Convention petition for return of a child to a fo…
Vega v. Tekoh - Post-Decision SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 9:44
On June 23rd, the Court decided Vega vs. Tekoh, a case which concerned whether an un-mirandized statement against a defendant in a criminal proceeding violates the fifth amendment and might support a section 1983 claim a…
Viking River Cruises v. Moriana - Post-Argument SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 13:59
On March 30th, the Court heard oral argument in Viking River Cruises, Inc. vs. Moriana, a case which concerned whether the Federal Arbitration Act requires enforcement of a bilateral arbitration agreement providing that…
Siegel v. Fitzgerald - Post-Argument SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 8:21
In April, 2022, the Court heard arguments in Siegel v. Fitzgerald, a bankruptcy case concerning fee increase exemptions in two states. Joining today to discuss the argument is Allyson Ho, partner in the Dallas Office of…
Morgan v. Sundance - Post-Decision SCOTUScast [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 13:40
On May 23, 2022 the Court decided Morgan vs. Sundance. Joining today to discuss the 9-0 decision is Stephen J. Ware, the Frank Edwards Tyler Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Kansas Law School.