#612: Does Sweet Taste Exposure Actually Develop Preference? – Prof. Katherine Appleton

#612: Does Sweet Taste Exposure Actually Develop Preference? – Prof. Katherine Appleton

Author: Danny Lennon July 7, 2026 Duration: 38:59

A common idea is that repeated exposure to sweet taste strengthens our preference for sweetness, which then drives greater intake of sweet foods and drinks. This idea is often used in arguments about fruit, low-calorie sweeteners, diet drinks, and the supposed need to "reset" taste preferences by avoiding sweetness altogether.

But does the evidence actually support that causal chain?

In this episode, Prof. Katherine Appleton, Professor of Psychology at Bournemouth University, discusses what is known about sweet taste exposure, sweet preference, and how these concepts are measured in the scientific literature.

Timestamps:

  • [04:23] Interview starts
  • [07:35] Sweetness terms explained
  • [10:17] Sweet liker phenotypes
  • [14:03] Liking vs wanting vs preference
  • [19:18] Trial evidence overview
  • [23:48] Policy and practical impact
  • [30:41] Why we eat foods

Links:


Sigma Nutrition Radio, hosted by nutrition scientist Danny Lennon, moves beyond the noise of diet trends and simplistic advice to explore the complex, fascinating world of human nutrition. This is a space for deep, evidence-based conversations that acknowledge the nuance and often contradictory nature of scientific research. Each episode delves into a specific topic within health, fitness, or dietetics, breaking down the underlying physiology, examining the latest studies, and discussing practical implications with expert guests. The goal isn't to hand out rigid meal plans but to cultivate the critical thinking skills necessary to navigate the ever-changing landscape of nutritional science. You'll hear detailed analyses of how research is conducted, thoughtful debates on contentious issues, and explorations of how evidence translates-or doesn't-into real-world recommendations for different individuals. Tuning into this podcast means committing to a more sophisticated understanding of how food, movement, and metabolism interact, leaving you better equipped to make informed decisions about your own health and skepticism towards the next big headline. Danny’s approach is both rigorous and accessible, making even the most detailed biochemical pathways relevant to everyday life. It’s for anyone who has ever wondered about the real story behind a nutrition claim and values substance over soundbites.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 50

Sigma Nutrition Radio
Podcast Episodes
#609: Unprocessed Red Meat & Cancer Risk [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:09:44
Unprocessed red meat and cancer risk remains one of the most debated topics in nutrition science, partly because the evidence is often presented in overly simplistic terms. The key question is not whether to adopt a vagu…
#608: Performance Nutrition in Elite Rugby – James Morehen, PhD [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:08:02
Performance nutrition in elite sport is often discussed in terms of meal plans, supplements, and macronutrient targets. However, effective practice in professional environments depends just as much on education, trust, c…
PMOS (PCOS) and Diet: What Can Nutrition Realistically Do? - SNP#50 [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 19:13
In this episode, we examine what nutrition can realistically do in the condition historically known as PCOS, now renamed polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome, or PMOS. We begin by explaining why the name change matte…
#606: Practical Nutrition Strategies for Fat Loss – Luke Hanna [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 41:23
Body composition goals, particularly bodyfat loss, are among the most common reasons people seek support from a nutritionist or health and fitness professional. While the principles are well established, the challenge is…
#604: How To Interpret Nutrition Research – David Allison, PhD [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 52:16
How should we decide what counts as trustworthy evidence? Scientific rigor is not a single characteristic of a study, but a chain of decisions made from the moment a question is conceived to the point at which findings a…