U.S. Elections Under Pressure from White House

U.S. Elections Under Pressure from White House

Author: Stanford Law School September 18, 2026 Duration: 30:37
Nate Persily joins Pam Karlan to discuss efforts to change the rules governing the 2026 elections and the legal battles over how those changes would affect voting.

Law is woven into the fabric of our daily existence, from the headlines we read to the personal decisions we make. Stanford Legal, from Stanford Law School, exists to unravel these complex threads, offering clarity and depth on the legal forces shaping our world. Rather than dry lectures, this podcast features conversations that delve into the real cases, ethical conflicts, and pressing questions at the intersection of law, government, and society. You’ll hear from leading legal minds like Professor Pam Karlan, whose expertise includes the constitutional "law of democracy" governing voting and political processes, alongside other scholars and practitioners. Each episode is built on the idea that understanding the law is crucial to understanding our culture and current events. The discussions are timely and substantive, examining how legal principles translate into tangible effects on communities and individuals. Tuning in provides a nuanced perspective on the news, moving beyond soundbites to explore the underlying statutes, court rulings, and debates. It’s for anyone curious about how legal frameworks influence everything from policy and civil rights to technology and everyday life. This isn't just academic theory; it's about the rules that define our shared reality. The Stanford Legal podcast makes that ongoing conversation accessible and engaging, offering listeners a deeper grasp of the systems that organize and often challenge our society.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 50

Stanford Legal
Podcast Episodes
Inside the Supreme Court’s Key 2026 Decisions [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 36:07
Jeff Fisher discusses a term marked by major rulings across executive power, voting, and civil rights, and what they signal about the Court’s trajectory.
The Declaration of Independence as Obligation [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 43:44
The episode examines the Declaration of Independence’s claim that people may have a duty—not just a right—to overthrow tyrannical government. Martha Minow explores possible foundations for that duty in natural law, relig…
The Case for a Public Share in AI [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 25:54
Jeremy Bearer-Friend and Sarah Polcz discuss their proposal to require leading AI firms to pay taxes in equity, reshaping how the gains from AI are distributed
Declaration at 250 Trailer [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:52
Nearly 250 years after its adoption, the Declaration of Independence remains one of America’s most revered—and most disputed—texts. In Declaration at 250, Stanford Law’s Constitutional Law Center and Stanford Legal bring…
The Law Must Be King [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 55:35
Judge J. Michael Luttig on the Rule of Law in an Era of Executive Overreach
Voting Rights at a Turning Point [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 35:28
Pamela Karlan and Nathaniel Persily on the Supreme Court’s latest decision on redistricting and minority representation.