McConnell v. Barnett | Retained by the People

McConnell v. Barnett | Retained by the People

Author: The Federalist Society January 27, 2021 Duration: 27:30
In this episode of the FedSoc Films Podcast, esteemed law professors Michael W. McConnell (Stanford Law) and Randy E. Barnett (Georgetown Law) discuss where they agree and disagree about the case law and meaning of the Ninth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This episode expands on the discussion from our short film Retained by the People: The Ninth Amendment that explores the history and purpose of the Ninth Amendment.

Thanks again for listening to the FedSoc Films Podcast! Be sure to rate and review us on your favorite podcast platform.

Watch the full film, Retained by the People: The Ninth Amendment, on YouTube at https://youtu.be/hlrt0cktLtE

Learn more about Professor Michael W. McConnell at https://law.stanford.edu/directory/michael-w-mcconnell/

Learn more about Professor Randy E. Barnett at https://www.law.georgetown.edu/faculty/randy-e-barnett/

As always, the Federalist Society takes no position on particular legal or public policy issues; all expressions of opinion are those of the speaker.

Visit www.fedsoc.org/ to learn more.

Follow us on Instagram at https://www.instagram.com/fedsoc/, on YouTube at https://www.youtube.com/user/TheFederalistSociety, on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/Federalist.Society/, and Twitter at https://twitter.com/FedSoc!

#FedSoc #FedSocFilms #FederalistSociety #DocumentaryShort #Documentary

Produced by The Federalist Society, The FedSoc Films Podcast extends the conversation started by their documentary films. This isn't a simple recap but a dedicated space for the nuanced discussions that the visual medium can only introduce. Each episode pulls back the curtain on the ideas and legal principles shaping the stories you've seen, featuring the scholars, judges, and policy experts who understand them best. You'll hear candid debates and detailed commentary that explore the intersection of law, culture, and governance. The analysis is rigorous but accessible, designed for anyone curious about the foundational debates in contemporary society. It's a natural companion to the film series, offering depth and context that turns a compelling narrative into a fuller understanding of the issues at play. This podcast operates on the principle that the most important conversations continue long after the credits roll, providing a forum for that continued examination. The focus remains on substantive dialogue and expert perspective, reflecting the organization's commitment to fostering thoughtful discourse on matters of legal and public policy.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 45

The FedSoc Films Podcast
Podcast Episodes
The Making of Taking Poletown | Taking Poletown [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 45:40
In 2021, we released our award-winning film, Taking Poletown: A Community’s Fight Over Economic Justice & Eminent Domain, that showcases the battle waged by the residents of Poletown to stop GM and the city of Detroit fr…
Humility & Influence | Madison and the Fight for the Constitution [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 36:28
What does it take to get a convention of delegates to agree on one important document? In this episode of the FedSoc Films Podcast, Samantha interviews Professor David Forte of Madison and the Fight for the Constitution…
Overturning Poletown: County of Wayne v. Hathcock  | Taking Poletown [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 46:27
For over 20 years, the Michigan Supreme Court ruling in Poletown Neighborhood Council v. Detroit, often referred to simply as Poletown, set the precedent for how and why eminent domain can be used. This was a controversi…
Section 230 & the First Amendment | Leave A Decent Comment [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 45:42
When politicians and big tech clash over political bias, fake news, and content moderation, who wins? How best do we preserve free speech online?At the heart of this battle is a once-obscure section of an unpopular law f…