Ep. 3607 TRUMP’s Border Chief DEFIES Rogue Activist Judge!!!
A Canadian-born federal judge, Sarah Ellis, has controversially asserted her authority to command U.S. military operations, demanding daily court appearances from Border Patrol Chief Gregory Pavino. This unprecedented judicial action raises significant questions about judicial overreach and the separation of powers as Chief Pavino continues to defy her orders while managing an aggressive immigration enforcement campaign in Chicago. The situation reflects broader concerns regarding the constitutional limits of judicial authority and the operational autonomy of federal law enforcement under the executive branch.
–
Join me, and let’s rediscover the foundations of truth that built Western civilization.
Go to https://turley.pub/abolitionofman and start your free preview today.
*The content presented by sponsors may contain affiliate links. When you click and shop the links, Turley Talks may receive a small commission.*
Highlights:
• "Judge Sarah Ellis claims authority to micromanage Border Patrol operations in real-time."
• "Border Patrol Chief Gregory Pavino defies a restraining order while ensuring federal agents' self-defense rights."
• "The absurdity of a judicial order limiting law enforcement's use of force against violent protesters."
• "Concerns over the implications of judicial overreach on executive branch authority and national security."
–
Thank you for taking the time to listen to this episode. If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe and/or leave a review.
FOLLOW me on X (Twitter): https://twitter.com/DrTurleyTalks
Sign up for the 'New Conservative Age Rising' Email Alerts to get lots of articles on conservative trends: https://turleytalks.com/subscribe-to-our-newsletter
**The use of any copyrighted material in this podcast is done so for educational and informational purposes only including parody, commentary, and criticism. See Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015). It is believed that this constitutes a "fair use" of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.
