The radical far-Left has crossed a line that no civilized society should tolerate. The neo-Marxist troglodytes targeting Tesla dealerships with violent, destructive attacks—smashing windows, torching cars, and destroying property—are not activists. They’re not noble defenders of some grand cause. They’re domestic terrorists, plain and simple, and it’s time we stop coddling them with soft words and weaker consequences.
These thugs deserve to be hunted down, locked up, and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Anything less is a betrayal of justice and a green light for more chaos.
Let’s cut through the nonsense. These attacks aren’t random outbursts of frustration—they’re calculated assaults on a company that dares to innovate, dares to challenge the sacred cows of the eco-fanatics and their anti-capitalist cronies. Tesla, for all its flaws, represents progress: cutting-edge technology that pushes humanity forward created by a guy who rescues purposely stranded astronauts.
But that’s not good enough for the far-Left radicals. No, they’d rather burn it all down than admit the world isn’t bending to their pseudo-utopian delusions. They hate Elon Musk, they hate success, and they hate anything that doesn’t grovel at the altar of their sanctimonious ideology. So they lash out like spoiled, ignorant brats, smashing and destroying what others have built.
What’s happening at Tesla dealerships isn’t protest—it’s terrorism. The Department of Justice defines domestic terrorism as acts dangerous to human life that violate federal or state law and are intended to intimidate or coerce a civilian population or influence government policy through violence. Tell me, how does hurling Molotov cocktails through showroom windows not fit that bill? How does vandalizing cars and terrorizing employees not qualify as intimidation? These cowards aren’t holding signs or chanting slogans—they’re wielding weapons and leaving wreckage in their wake. That’s not free speech; that’s a felony. And every single one of them should be treated like the threat they are.
The far-Left loves to cloak their violence in self-righteous drivel—claiming they’re fighting climate change or corporate greed. What a load of unmitigated bullshit. If they cared about the planet, they’d applaud Tesla’s mission, not attack it. This isn’t about principle; it’s about selfish power. It’s about tearing down anything that doesn’t fit their narrow, neo-Jacobin authoritarian worldview. They’re not saving the Earth—they’re just arrogantly self-righteous bullies with a fake cause, and they’ve picked Tesla as their punching bag because it’s a symbol of everything they despise: ambition, innovation, and individual freedom. Well, I’ve got news for them: we’re done tolerating their tantrums; the American people are tired of their destructive, criminal, adolescent crap!
Look at the damage they’ve caused. Dealerships in California, Oregon, and beyond have been hit—windows shattered, vehicles torched, and livelihoods threatened. Employees who just want to do their jobs are now dodging bricks and breathing smoke. Customers who dared to buy a Tesla are having their property trashed.
This isn’t some victimless crime—it’s an assault on innocent people, all because a bunch of unhinged infantile radicals can’t handle reality. And what’s the response from the bleeding-heart apologists? Excuses. “They’re passionate.” “They’re frustrated.” To that, I say, “Fuck you!” Passion doesn’t give you a free pass to destroy. Frustration doesn’t justify terrorism. These are grown adults choosing to break the law, and they need to face grown-up consequences.
The law isn’t optional—it’s the line between order and anarchy. When you let these criminal provocateurs off with a slap on the wrist, you’re telling every other wannabe pseudo-revolutionary that violence pays. That’s why prosecution has to be relentless and unforgiving for these assholes.
Charge them with vandalism, arson, assault—whatever sticks. Throw in domestic terrorism enhancements and make it federal. Lock them up for decades if the evidence holds. No plea deals, no community service, no second chances. They wanted to send a message with their Molotovs? Let’s send one back: you don’t get to terrorize people and walk away.
And don’t even start with the “but the system’s unfair” whining. The far-Left loves to play martyr when they’re caught, crying about oppression while they’re the ones oppressing everyone else with their intolerance, ignorance, and violence. They don’t get a pass because they’re mad at capitalism or Musk’s tweets. The rest of us—members of a civilized society—don’t smash things when we’re upset, why should they?
Equal justice means they face the same hammer as anyone else who pulls this crap. Anything less is favoritism, and it’s an insult to every law-abiding citizen who recognizes that it’s a crime to torch a building when life gets tough.
This is a war on sanity, waged by a radical fringe that’s been indulged for far too long. The Tesla attacks are just the latest symptom of a far-Left rot that’s festering unchecked—encouraged by spineless politicians and a media that calls them “activists” instead of what they are: criminals, domestic terrorists. Enough is enough.
Round them up, prosecute them, and let them rot in cells where they can’t hurt anyone else. Society’s had its fill of their childish, destructive chaos. It’s time to crush this madness before it spreads any further. Anything less is a ceding of our Republic to anarchy.
Then, when we return, our segment on America’s Third Watch, broadcast nationally from our flagship station WGUL AM930 & FM93.7 in Tampa, Florida.
Underground USA is reader-supported. Please consider becoming a paid subscriber.
President Trump Must Defy the Activist Federal Judiciary
President Donald Trump faces a judiciary weaponized by anti-Trump Democrats and activist judges intent on thwarting his second-term agenda. From injunctions halting deportations to legal roadblocks obstructing Elon Musk’s DOGE reforms, the federal judiciary has emerged as an adversary pushing the limits of its constitutional authority.
Chief Justice John Roberts’ rebuke of Trump’s defiance—particularly his call to impeach Judge James Boasberg over a deportation ruling—underscores the tension between an electorally mandated Executive and a Judiciary overstepping its bounds. Trump must stand firm, defying these activist rulings and asserting the Executive’s rightful authority to fulfill the mandate of the American people. The judiciary’s actions threaten the Constitution itself.
Since Trump’s reinauguration on January 20, 2025, lower courts have issued injunctions to paralyze his administration. On March 15, 2025, Obama appointee Judge Boasberg blocked deportation flights targeting the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798, asserting control over national security and immigration—domains reserved for the Executive. The Trump administration argued the flights departed before Boasberg’s order was formalized, citing national security, yet the judge’s probing of “possible defiance” reveals an intent to undermine the president.
Similarly, the DOGE initiative, a cornerstone of Trump’s pledge to streamline bureaucracy, has faced judicial interference. Judges have restricted Musk’s team from accessing Treasury data, citing dubious constitutional concerns. Judge Theodore Chuang ruled DOGE “likely” violated the Constitution by shutting down the US Agency for International Development, a cesspool of corruption and graft. Yet testimony before Judge Tanya Chutkan revealed Musk is a “senior adviser” to Trump—a Special Government Employee role akin to Anita Dunn’s under Biden. DOGE’s day-to-day is led by Amy Gleason, a former US Digital Service official named acting administrator in 2025.
These rulings are political, not legal. Anti-Trump Democrats, bruised from their 2024 defeat, have turned to courts to obstruct the voters’ will. This judicial activism plagued Trump’s first term with injunctions against his travel ban and border wall, but its 2025 intensity signals a politicized judiciary emboldened by unchecked power.
This lawfare drowns courts in frivolous injunctions to trap White House lawyers in a circus of filings—a desperate gambit by the “resistance” to dismantle the Deep State apparatus propping up Democrats. Taxpayer cash funnels into “non-governmental organizations”—piggy banks for kickbacks to loyal foot-soldiers vandalizing Tesla dealerships. Leading this sabotage are Mark Zaid, Norm Eisen, Mary McCord, Marc Elias, Barbara McQuade, and Joanna Lydgate—Deep State lawyers weaponizing courts to strangle democracy with bad-faith litigation.
On March 18, 2025, Roberts rebuked Trump’s call for Boasberg’s impeachment, declaring it inappropriate for judicial disagreement. This is rich with irony. Roberts, who legislated from the bench on Obamacare, fails to acknowledge lower courts’ activism with nationwide injunctions. His criticism is a power play to shield a judiciary turned tool of the Left. In 2018, he chastised Trump for calling a judge an “Obama judge,” yet stayed silent when Democrats assailed conservative justices. His 2024 immunity ruling for Trump emboldened the Executive, yet now he postures to preserve judicial supremacy.
Critics say Roberts protects the rule of law, but this collapses under scrutiny. The rule of law doesn’t mean blind obedience to judicial edicts, especially when courts overstep. Boasberg’s injunction relies on tenuous grounds—the Alien Enemies Act’s use in wars doesn’t preclude its application to modern threats like Tren de Aragua or the border crisis prompting Trump’s emergency declaration. Roberts’ failure to curb nationwide injunctions, questioned by Justice Thomas in 2018, exposes his complicity in judicial overreach. Trump’s defiance defends against a judiciary usurping Executive prerogative.
History supports Trump’s stand. In 1832, Andrew Jackson ignored the Supreme Court’s Worcester v. Georgia ruling, prioritizing federal authority. In 1937, FDR threatened to pack the Court when it struck down New Deal laws, forcing it to relent and exposing its opportunistic infidelity to the Constitution. During the Civil War, Lincoln suspended habeas corpus despite judicial opposition, asserting Executive authority in emergencies. These examples show the judiciary isn’t infallible—Dred Scott proves it—and the Executive need not bow when courts exceed their role.
Trump’s situation mirrors these moments. His deportations address gang infiltration tied to illegal immigration, while DOGE tackles a bloated bureaucracy—both within Article II powers. When judges issue sweeping injunctions, they subvert democracy, negating voters who endorsed Trump’s platform. Defiance reclaims constitutional balance.
The Constitution designates the Supreme Court, not lower courts, as coequal to the Executive, yet activist judges attempt to wield power far beyond their station. Trump’s defiance is a necessary counterweight to restore the Executive’s rightful place.
The stakes are high. If Trump yields, his presidency and the people’s will are neutered. Democrats, losing at the ballot box, exploit courts via forum-shopping in liberal districts for favorable rulings. A single judge can halt deportations or cripple DOGE, overriding the Commander-in-Chief’s authority and a landslide mandate. This isn’t checks and balances; it’s judicial tyranny.
Trump should defy these injunctions, proceed with deportations under Article II, and push DOGE forward. The Supreme Court’s conservative majority, including three Trump appointees, should back him if lower courts escalate. Historical precedent—from Jackson to Lincoln to FDR—supports him. The American people, who elected him to drain the swamp and secure the border, demand it.
Roberts’ rebuke is a distraction from an elitist clinging to judicial purity. The real threat is a judiciary run amok, abetted by anti-Trump Democrats desperate to cling to power. By standing firm, Trump can expose this charade, rally his base, and reaffirm the Executive’s role as the people’s voice. Defiance is the path to victory.
Get full access to Underground USA at
www.undergroundusa.com/subscribe
