Trump’s Reciprocal Tariffs: Fear Porn At A Fever Pitch

On April 2, 2025, President Donald Trump unveiled his reciprocal tariff policy, a bold stroke to rebalance global trade and deliver a windfall to American taxpayers. Branded "Liberation Day," this plan promises to slash the trade deficit, boost domestic industry, and restore economic sovereignty. Predictably, the usual suspects—ivory-tower economists and free-trade purists—are gasping in horror, warning of inflation and trade wars. But with Canada and Israel already pledging to zero out tariffs on US goods, Trump’s strategy is proving its worth before it’s fully off the ground.

The congressional GOP must rally behind this policy, not just for party loyalty, but because it’s a pragmatic, taxpayer-friendly move that could redefine America’s economic future—potentially even paving the way to ditch the income tax.

American taxpayers have long shouldered the burden of a lopsided trade system. The US has boasted some of the world’s lowest tariffs—averaging 2.2%—while nations like India (12%) and China (with effective rates ballooning under non-tariff barriers) enjoy near-unfettered access to our markets. The fallout? A $1.2 trillion goods trade deficit in 2024, a gutted manufacturing base, and a tax system that squeezes workers to prop up foreign economies. Trump’s reciprocal tariffs turn this on its head.

By matching foreign tariffs—34% on China, 20% on the EU, up to 49% on outliers like Cambodia—Trump is forcing a reset.

Critics bleat about higher consumer prices, conveniently glossing over the policy’s core: incentivizing domestic production. “Build your plant here, no tariffs,” Trump declares. Companies that relocate will hire Americans, pay US taxes, and shrink the trade deficit. That’s not a tax hike—it’s a tax relief blueprint. Meanwhile, companies like Ford are establishing product discounts, calling them “From America, For America” discounts. More jobs, “Made in the USA” discounts, and higher wages mean less reliance on public assistance, easing the strain on taxpayers.

Here’s the kicker: tariffs could be the key to axing the income tax entirely.

In 2024, the federal government collected $2.2 trillion from individual income taxes. Trump’s team projects reciprocal tariffs could generate $500 billion to $1 trillion annually, depending on compliance and retaliation. Pair that with corporate tax revenue from repatriated businesses, and you’ve got a revenue stream that could replace the IRS’s chokehold on American paychecks.

Before 1913, tariffs funded nearly half the government; today, they’re a measly 1% of revenue. Trump’s plan revives that model, shifting the burden from workers to importers and foreign profiteers. Opponents who scoff at this as “unrealistic” are just scared of losing their sacred cow—complex tax codes that favor their cronies.

The congressional GOP has a chance to back a policy that screams economic nationalism and job creation—core party tenets. Yet, some, like House Agriculture Chair Glenn Thompson (R-PA), fret over trade wars and farmers’ fertilizer costs. Thompson’s push for exemptions is myopic. Trump’s already shown flexibility, sparing Canada and Mexico from the 10% baseline tariff and carving out exceptions for drugs and computer chips. This isn’t reckless protectionism; it’s calculated leverage.

Republicans can seize this to cement their working-class credibility. When Canada and Israel drop tariffs, US exporters—from Midwest farmers to Texas tech firms—win big. That’s Red-state gold. If the GOP wavers, Democrats will swoop in to claim the jobs victory. Critics fearing retaliation are trapped in a pre-Trump daze of negotiate-and-concede. Trump’s tariffs-first approach already has Canada bending the knee. The GOP must trust his playbook and unite, or risk botching a legacy-defining win.

The anti-tariff crowd’s loudest cry—that we’ll spark a global trade war and isolate America—falls flat against early successes. Canada, our top trade partner, and Israel, a staunch ally, have preemptively pledged zero tariffs on US goods. This isn’t goodwill; it’s Trump’s leverage at work. Canada, with trade at 67% of its GDP and the US as its biggest market, can’t afford a 25% hit on exports. Israel, eyeing deeper ties, followed suit. These moves prove tariffs aren’t just sticks—they’re carrots that deliver.

The dominoes have a high probability of continuing to fall. If the EU (facing 20%) or Japan (24%) lower barriers to dodge retaliation, the trade deficit shrinks, and US exporters thrive. Critics warning of stagflation ignore Trump’s first-term China tariffs, which didn’t crash the economy but forced a deal. Now, with a wider scope and stronger mandate, the leverage is even greater.

Trump’s reciprocal tariffs are a lifeline for taxpayers, a rallying cry for the GOP, and a strategic masterstroke harkening from the successes of the past. They promise to claw back wealth, reward domestic production, and pressure partners into fair deals—already evident with Canada and Israel’s concessions. They could even fund the government enough to kill the income tax, freeing Americans from April’s annual misery.

The doomsayers can clutch their models in their sweaty little hands and scream “trade war,” but the real war has been against US workers for decades. Trump’s ending it on our terms. The GOP must stand firm, or squander a shot at making America not just great, but prosperous again…and free of the IRS.

Then, when we return, our segment on America’s Third Watch, broadcast nationally from our flagship station WGUL AM930 & FM93.7 in Tampa, Florida.

Underground USA is reader-supported. Please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Schumer & Senate Democrats:A Betrayal Of The American Electorate

In a move that reeks of political opportunism and disdain for the integrity of the American electoral process, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and his cadre of Senate Democrats have threatened to filibuster the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act. This legislation, a commonsense measure aimed at ensuring that only US citizens can vote in federal elections, has exposed the true colors of Schumer and his party: a willingness to sacrifice the sanctity of the ballot box for the sake of pandering to pro-illegal immigrant activists and securing a permanent electoral advantage.

This is not just a policy disagreement—it’s a calculated assault on the very foundation of our Republic.

The SAVE Act, passed by the House in July 2024 with bipartisan support, is straightforward. It requires states to verify citizenship before registering voters and mandates the removal of non-citizens from voter rolls. It’s a law that should be uncontroversial, a no-brainer for anyone who believes that the right to vote is a privilege reserved for those who are citizens of our Republic.

Yet, Schumer and his Democrat minions in the Senate are planning to obstruct it, clinging to the filibuster—the very tool they’ve spent years decrying as a “Jim Crow relic” when it suits their narrative—as a shield to protect their radical agenda. Their threat to block this bill is nothing less than an attempt to dilute the voice of the American electorate by opening the floodgates to non-citizen voters.

Let’s not mince words: Schumer’s opposition to the SAVE Act is a blatant power grab. For years, Democrats have relied on identity politics and the cultivation of grievance-based voting blocs to maintain their grip on power. Now, facing a shifting political landscape and a populace increasingly fed up with their failed policies, they’re turning to a new strategy—harnessing the votes of those who have no legal right to cast a ballot.

By resisting a law that would enforce existing federal statutes prohibiting non-citizen voting, Schumer and his party are signaling their intent to exploit a loophole-ridden system, and one that pro-illegal immigrant activists have long salivated over. This isn’t about compassion or inclusion; it’s about stacking the deck.

The hypocrisy of Schumer and Senate Democrats is stupefying. These are the same people who spent the Trump years shrieking about “election integrity” and “foreign interference” whenever it suited their narrative. Yet, when presented with a chance to secure the vote against actual interference by ensuring only citizens participate, they balk? Why? Because the interference they once decried pales in comparison to the electoral windfall they hope to reap from illegal immigrants casting ballots. Schumer’s filibuster threat isn’t a defense of principle; it’s a cynical ploy to preserve a vulnerability in our system that Democrats have weaponized.

And make no mistake, the activists cheering Schumer on are complicit in this travesty. Groups like the ACLU and various open-borders advocates—including US District Court Judge James Boasberg’s daughter, Katherine Boasberg, who works for Partners for Justice, a 501(c)(3) organization that provides legal assistance to "justice-involved individuals," including undocumented immigrants and, notably, those accused of gang affiliations—have long pushed the fiction that requiring proof of citizenship is somehow discriminatory or burdensome. They peddle sob stories and half-truths, claiming that such measures suppress turnout, while conveniently ignoring the fact that millions of Americans—citizens—manage to register and vote without issue every election cycle.

Their real goal isn’t fairness; it’s the erosion of sovereignty, both physical and civic, to create a borderless electorate beholden to their neo-Jacobin ideology. Schumer, ever the slimy political chameleon, is all too happy to play along, trading the rights of his constituents for the applause of this radical fringe.

Voting is the bedrock of our republic, the mechanism by which citizens hold their leaders accountable. When that process is compromised—when the votes of law-abiding Americans are diluted by those who have bypassed our laws to illegally enter and include themselves—it undermines the legitimacy of every election. Schumer knows this. He’s not naive; he’s a seasoned and disingenuous operator who’s spent decades mastering the art of public manipulation and political survival. His decision to threaten a filibuster isn’t born of ignorance but of cold calculation. He’s betting that the short-term gain of a few extra votes outweighs the long-term damage to public trust in the democratic system of our Republic.

Senate Democrats, following Schumer’s lead, are no less culpable. They’ve cloaked their opposition in lofty rhetoric about “access” and “equity,” but it’s a flimsy disguise for their true aim: entrenching power at any cost.

Figures like Cory Booker (D-NJ) and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), who’ve built their brands on insincere moral posturing, have been conspicuously silent or evasive on the SAVE Act, unwilling to confront the uncomfortable reality of their party’s direction. Their inaction speaks volumes. They’re content to let Schumer take the heat while quietly endorsing a strategy that betrays their own voters.

The American people deserve better than this. We deserve leaders who prioritize the rule of law over political expediency, who understand that citizenship means something—that it’s not just a bureaucratic label but a bond of mutual obligation.

By threatening to filibuster the SAVE Act, Schumer and Senate Democrats are sending a clear message: they care more about the rights of illegal immigrants and their activist cheerleaders than the rights of the citizens they swore to represent. It’s a disgraceful abdication of duty, one that should haunt them at the ballot box—if, that is, the ballot box remains a place reserved for critically-thinking American citizens.

This isn’t just a policy fight; it’s a moral reckoning. Schumer and his party have chosen their side, and it’s not with the American electorate. They’ve aligned themselves with those who see our laws as optional and our sovereignty as negotiable. The SAVE Act isn’t an absolute remedy, but it’s a huge step toward protecting what makes this nation worth defending. By standing in its way, Schumer and Senate Democrats aren’t just playing politics—they’re undermining the very system that gives them their power.

History won’t judge them kindly, nor should it. Nor should we. The mid-terms are coming/ Let’s all—all of us—send a message.