Police, Race, and Federalism

Police, Race, and Federalism

Author: Roman Mars June 27, 2020 Duration: 30:25
As people around the world continue to protest police brutality, Republicans and Democrats in Congress have proposed bills that would reform policing across the U.S. But in the American system, states are given a lot of latitude over law enforcement, down to the use of tactics like chokeholds and tear gas. Given the constitution, what can the federal government actually do to make things better? Also, why was the ever-obscure Third Amendment trending last month?

Roman Mars hosts What Trump Can Teach Us About Con Law, a series that uses the unprecedented events of a single presidency as a live case study in American government. The core of the podcast comes from constitutional law professor Elizabeth Joh, who found her usual curriculum upended during those four years. Instead of relying solely on settled historical cases, she began scrambling to reconcile the latest presidential tweet or statement with centuries of judicial precedent minutes before walking into her classroom. Each episode digs into one of those real-time constitutional puzzles-questions about pardons, emoluments, executive orders, and presidential power that moved from theoretical to urgently practical. Listening feels like auditing a dynamic, topical seminar where complex legal concepts are unpacked through the lens of recent history. You’ll hear how the foundational document is stretched, tested, and interpreted not in the abstract, but through the actions of the 45th president. This isn’t about politics; it’s about the machinery of the constitution itself, examined at a moment when it was under extraordinary public scrutiny. The podcast makes the often-opaque world of constitutional law accessible and immediately relevant, showing how its principles are constantly being defined by the present.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 93

What Trump Can Teach Us About Con Law
Podcast Episodes
On the Other End of the Line [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 37:44
Trump's improper dealing with Ukraine was what led to his first impeachment. While most of us were focused on the domestic political implications of Trump's action, the country of Ukraine was put into jeopardy in a way t…
Book Banning and the Constitution [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 36:44
What can the government do about the school library and the classroom and what does the Constitution say about it?
The Administrative State [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 39:05
What two SCOTUS rulings about COVID vaccine mandates tell us about the future of the Administrative State
A Jurisprudence of Doubt [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 42:15
What are the current precedents when it comes to abortion rights and how solid do they feel right now?
Executive Privilege, SB 8 update, and Rust [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 27:31
An update on SB 8, Executive Privilege of presidential records, and a short digression into criminal law with the tragic death on a movie set
The Eastman Memo [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 28:27
John Eastman, a mainstream conservative lawyer working for Trump, outlined a plan for VP Pence to declare Trump the winner of the 2020 election regardless of the votes. It didn't happen, but should we be worried about th…
Shadow Docket [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 32:50
The Shadow Docket, Texas's SB 8, and the state of abortion rights in the US
Double Dose of Jacobson [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 26:18
As people argue over public policy regarding the COVID vaccine, Jacobson V. Massachusetts (1905) is invoked a lot. Plus, Trump is in court and the first Capitol riot conviction.
Bong Hits for Jesus [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 33:32
A quick roundup of three Supreme Court decisions that came down at the end of June
Hate Crimes [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 27:57
On May 20, 2021, President Biden signed the COVID-19 Hate Crimes Act. What exactly is a hate crime and what does the Constitution say about them?