How AI could create the world’s biggest problems (article by Zershaaneh Qureshi)

How AI could create the world’s biggest problems (article by Zershaaneh Qureshi)

Author: The 80,000 Hours team June 11, 2026 Duration: 1:29:46

Imagine you’re living 15,000 years ago. Your people are hunter-gatherers and you sleep under the stars. If someone told you humans would one day build cities with millions of people, fly through the air, or carry all human knowledge in their pockets, you couldn’t even begin to picture what they meant... Yet here we are.

How did our lives change so far beyond recognition? The story is complex, but there’s a rough pattern. A few times in history, some radical breakthrough in technology — like the development of the plough and the steam engine — has led to a wave of productivity, innovation, and social change that ultimately reshaped the world.

Now we’re on the cusp of a huge new breakthrough: artificial intelligence that can meet or exceed human capabilities across a wide range of tasks.

This could bring another era of transformation. There could be an explosion of intelligence and innovation, and a whole new population of digital beings. And with this, civilisation could see changes at least as profound as those brought about by industrialisation or the rise of agriculture — but instead of taking hundreds or thousands of years to unfold, this time around the world could become unrecognisable over the span of decades or less.

This transformation could bring enormous benefits, helping us solve currently intractable global problems. But it could also pose severe risks, some of which could be existential — meaning they could cause human extinction, or an equally permanent and severe disempowerment of humanity.

There aren’t nearly enough people trying to address these challenges, and we think that’s a serious problem.

This article is narrated by the author, Zershaaneh Qureshi. It explores how advanced AI could be so transformative, and why working on its risks may be your best opportunity to have a positive impact on the world.

You can see the original article on the 80,000 Hours website: https://80000hours.org/problem-profiles/artificial-intelligence/ 

Chapters:

  • Introduction (00:00:20)
  • Section 1: AI could replace human labour in the most economically valuable fields (00:08:32)
  • Section 2: Replacing human labour in the most economically valuable fields could trigger the next radical transformation of society (00:22:14)
  • Section 3: This transformation could be extremely rapid and dramatic (00:28:02)
  • Section 4: A rapid AI-driven transformation would raise a range of major challenges, including existential risks (00:36:40)
  • Section 5: Work on these problems is tractable, but neglected (00:44:48)
  • Objection 1: “You're overestimating how fast and how dramatically AI would transform the world.” (00:47:59)
  • Objection 2: “It's hard to believe that AI could really pose existential risks.” (00:52:59)
  • Objection 3: “Isn't all this talk of AI changing the world just a fad?” (00:59:22)
  • Objection 4: “Isn't AI going to be just like every other technology?” (01:03:04)
  • Objection 5: “Is it even possible to produce artificial general intelligence?” (01:06:16)
  • Objection 6: “Even if AGI is achievable, what if we're really far away from building it?” (01:11:24)
  • Objection 7: “Isn't the real danger from actual current AI and not some sort of futuristic AGI?” (01:14:05)
  • Objection 8: “Technological progress is a good thing for humanity.” (01:18:10)
  • Objection 9: “This all just sounds too sci-fi.” (01:19:50)
  • Objection 10: “Can it really make sense to dedicate my career to solving an issue that's based on a speculative story about something that may or may not ever happen?” (01:22:15)
  • Objection 11: “OK, AI might pose existential risks, but isn't ‘issue X’ an even bigger problem?” (01:24:39)
  • Learn more (01:27:51)

Audio editing: Dominic Armstrong
Production: Zershaaneh Qureshi, Elizabeth Cox, Katy Moore, and Lou Moran


The 80,000 Hours Podcast, from The 80,000 Hours team, digs into the complex and often overlooked questions surrounding how we can best use our careers to tackle the world's most pressing problems. While artificial intelligence is a recurring and critical theme, framing some of the most important conversations you won't hear elsewhere, the discussions range far wider into the intersections of technology, policy, philosophy, and global priorities. Hosts Rob Wiblin, Luisa Rodriguez, and Zershaaneh Qureshi guide in-depth interviews with researchers, policymakers, and practitioners, breaking down daunting ideas into actionable insights. You'll hear nuanced analyses of career paths, ethical dilemmas in emerging tech, and evidence-based strategies for creating a positive impact. This isn't about quick tips; it's about deep, substantive exploration of how specific choices and systemic changes can lead to a better future. The podcast lives in the Education and Technology categories because it fundamentally aims to equip listeners with the knowledge and perspective to navigate a rapidly changing world thoughtfully. Each episode is built on rigorous research, challenging assumptions while maintaining a conversational and accessible tone. Tune in for a consistently engaging and intellectually honest look at the forces shaping our century and the practical steps individuals can take within their own 80,000-hour working lives to make a meaningful difference.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 50

80,000 Hours Podcast
Podcast Episodes
Jasmine Sun on what the people building AI really believe [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:06:21
Many AI researchers believe mass job displacement is coming — and some even think there’s a chance their technology will kill everyone. But they’re building it anyway. Writer and journalist Jasmine Sun has been documenti…
What makes for a dream job? | Benjamin Todd [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 28:18
What actually makes a job fulfilling? It's not what most career advice tells you. "Follow your passion" sounds inspiring, but it's misleading — and the research backs that up.Drawing on hundreds of studies, we’ve identif…