High Court Vaping Case Tests FDA's Regulatory Powers

High Court Vaping Case Tests FDA's Regulatory Powers

Author: Bloomberg Law November 22, 2024 Duration: 19:06
A case testing the federal government's ability to regulate potentially harmful tobacco products will kick off arguments at the US Supreme Court in December. The Biden Administration is fighting to keep off the market new liquids for e-cigarettes sold under flavors like "Blackberry Lemonade" and "Killer Kustard Blueberry" that can attract kids in its appeal of a US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decision to set aside the Food and Drug Administration's orders denying their approval. Typically, the court doesn't agree to hear a case "to pat the lower court on the head and say, 'Really good job,'" said Carter Phillips, a partner at Sidley Austin who's argued 90 cases before the justices. But, he said, "this is a court that is much more skeptical of agency decision-making than the court has ever been, at least in the time that I've been practicing before it." Phillips joins “Cases and Controversies” hosts Greg Stohr and Lydia Wheeler to talk about the case and why his client, the nonprofit Global Action to End Smoking Inc., is supporting neither side in this dispute,. Guest: Carter Phillips, Sidley Austin LLP Hosts: Greg Stohr and Lydia Wheeler Producer: Mo Barrow Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

Every Monday, the legal world turns its attention to the nation's highest bench, and Cases and Controversies is there to provide essential context. This Bloomberg Law podcast goes beyond the headlines to examine the real-world implications of the Supreme Court's docket. Rather than dry legal summaries, you'll hear nuanced discussions that unpack the complex narratives and strategic thinking behind pivotal cases. Each episode either sets the stage for upcoming oral arguments or delves into a consequential ruling with the people who know it best. The conversations feature a range of voices, including seasoned Supreme Court advocates, federal judges, astute law professors, practicing attorneys, and sharp legal journalists. Together, they explore the tensions and philosophies shaping American jurisprudence. Tuning into this podcast offers a front-row seat to the debates that define our rights, our institutions, and our society. It’s for anyone who wants to understand not just what the Court decides, but how and why those decisions are made, presented with the clarity and authority you expect from Bloomberg Law.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

Cases and Controversies
Podcast Episodes
Tense Exchanges, Big Supreme Court Argument Moments [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 7:47
Arguing at the Supreme Court is no walk in the park. The justices ask tough questions and give hypotheticals that can trip up even the most prepared advocate. As the year comes to a close, Cases and Controversies hosts L…
Grants in Abortion, Jan. 6 Add to Momentous Term [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 16:08
The Supreme Court added two high profile disputes to its docket and suggested it will fast-track a third involving former President, adding to an already consequential term. Hosts Kimberly Robinson, Lydia Wheeler, and Gr…
O’Connor’s Trailblazing Career Marked By Grit, Charisma [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 26:09
Justice Sandra Day O’Connor solidified her legacy as the first female jurist to sit on the Supreme Court. One of her former clerks, Tamarra Matthews Johnson, joins Cases and Controversies to discuss her former boss as a…
Justices Suggest Narrow Ruling on SEC Enforcement [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 15:37
The Supreme Court appeared likely to require the Securities and Exchange Commission to bring certain enforcement actions in federal court, rather than resolve them in-house. The only question appeared to be whether the j…
Supreme Court’s First Ethics Code Gets Cool Reception [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 18:24
The Supreme Court’s inaugural code of conduct, issued under pressure from transparency advocates and Congress, does little to quell concern over how the justices conduct themselves on ethics, critics say. The Brennan Cen…
Justices Weigh New Gun Test in Domestic Violence Case [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 23:03
A lopsided Supreme Court appeared ready to side with the Biden administration in a Second Amendment challenge to a federal gun ban for those subject to domestic violence restraining orders. The real issue for the justice…
Justices Seek Balance for Online Speech Protections [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 23:54
The justices searched for the proper line to balance free speech protections for public officials and their constituents online, in the first of several disputes involving social media this term. The Electronic Frontier…
Barrett Rocks Out As Justices Return to Courtroom [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 19:30
Justice Amy Coney Barrett made news this week when she became the latest justice to back a high court ethics code, but her tale of rocking out to the turn-of-the-century hit "Who Let the Dogs Out" in the stately halls of…
Justices Take Up South Carolina Redistricting Dispute [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 20:33
Fresh off last term’s win in an Alabama redistricting case, civil rights groups returned to the Supreme Court to argue that voting maps drawn by South Carolina Republicans disenfranchise Black voters and should be redraw…
Barrett, Kavanaugh Could Be Key in CFPB Funding Fight [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 22:56
Whether funding of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is unlawful or not could rest with conservative Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett, one court watcher says. Brennan Center for Justice President and…