High Court Vaping Case Tests FDA's Regulatory Powers

High Court Vaping Case Tests FDA's Regulatory Powers

Author: Bloomberg Law November 22, 2024 Duration: 19:06
A case testing the federal government's ability to regulate potentially harmful tobacco products will kick off arguments at the US Supreme Court in December. The Biden Administration is fighting to keep off the market new liquids for e-cigarettes sold under flavors like "Blackberry Lemonade" and "Killer Kustard Blueberry" that can attract kids in its appeal of a US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decision to set aside the Food and Drug Administration's orders denying their approval. Typically, the court doesn't agree to hear a case "to pat the lower court on the head and say, 'Really good job,'" said Carter Phillips, a partner at Sidley Austin who's argued 90 cases before the justices. But, he said, "this is a court that is much more skeptical of agency decision-making than the court has ever been, at least in the time that I've been practicing before it." Phillips joins “Cases and Controversies” hosts Greg Stohr and Lydia Wheeler to talk about the case and why his client, the nonprofit Global Action to End Smoking Inc., is supporting neither side in this dispute,. Guest: Carter Phillips, Sidley Austin LLP Hosts: Greg Stohr and Lydia Wheeler Producer: Mo Barrow Do you have feedback on this episode of Cases & Controversies? Give us a call and leave a voicemail at 703-341-3690.

Every Monday, the legal world turns its attention to the nation's highest bench, and Cases and Controversies is there to provide essential context. This Bloomberg Law podcast goes beyond the headlines to examine the real-world implications of the Supreme Court's docket. Rather than dry legal summaries, you'll hear nuanced discussions that unpack the complex narratives and strategic thinking behind pivotal cases. Each episode either sets the stage for upcoming oral arguments or delves into a consequential ruling with the people who know it best. The conversations feature a range of voices, including seasoned Supreme Court advocates, federal judges, astute law professors, practicing attorneys, and sharp legal journalists. Together, they explore the tensions and philosophies shaping American jurisprudence. Tuning into this podcast offers a front-row seat to the debates that define our rights, our institutions, and our society. It’s for anyone who wants to understand not just what the Court decides, but how and why those decisions are made, presented with the clarity and authority you expect from Bloomberg Law.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

Cases and Controversies
Podcast Episodes
Blockbuster Fallout Looms Over New Supreme Court Term [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 24:10
The Supreme Court kicks off its 2023 term on Monday with guns, abortion, and affirmative action potentially coming back—whether the justices are ready for them or not. Advocates and lower courts are emboldened by the hig…
Death Row Defendants Find Few Wins at Supreme Court [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 16:25
Death penalty cases are often adjudicated for years, if not decades, before they reach the Supreme Court. But once they do, the justices must make life-or-death decisions in a relatively quick amount of time. Death penal…
'Cases and Controversies': A Dramatic First Decade [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 20:26
From Antonin Scalia’s sudden death, to four new justices, a leaked opinion draft, the overturning of abortion rights, and the pandemic-era introduction of live audio for oral arguments—a lot has happened at the Supreme C…
Supreme Court ‘Supersized’ Major Questions Doctrine [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 33:49
Rejection of Joe Biden's student loan forgiveness plan suggests Supreme Court conservatives are going to be more comfortable with second-guessing federal agency determinations even when they fall within a federal statute…
Supreme Court Wraps Up With Conservative Trifecta on Big Cases [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 17:20
Conservative justices asserted themselves in a big way in the final days of the Supreme Court term. The six Republican-appointed justices joined together in striking down affirmative action, rejecting Joe Biden’s student…
Biggest Cases Loom as Supreme Court Hits Homestretch [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 19:42
The Supreme Court heads into the final week of the term for argued cases with a flurry of opinions on tap, including what could be a blockbuster on affirmative action in higher education and the fate of Joe Biden’s stude…
Tribal Adoption Law Survives Colorblind Challenge [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 13:12
In upholding a landmark measure meant to keep adopted American-Indian children with tribal families, the Supreme Court again declined to embrace a colorblind view of federal law. The conservative argument that race shoul…
Justices Surprise by Refusing to Remake Voting Rights [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 27:16
The Supreme Court declined to make it harder to bring racial challenges to voting rules, shocking court watchers who expected the majority conservative court to make major changes to the law. Goodwin's William Jay joins…
New Jackson Milestone as Supreme Court Term Nears End [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 19:15
Ketanji Brown Jackson continues to draw notice on the Supreme Court, this time writing the first solo dissent from a first-term justice since Clarence Thomas in 1991. Cases and Controversies hosts Kimberly Robinson and G…
Unanimity Doesn’t Mean Supreme Court Agrees Completely [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 23:12
· Court clips EPA authority over clean water · Chides local government on home seizure Although Supreme Court justices were unanimous in backing landowners in a Big EPA case, their reasoning in the latest check on admini…