Episode 43: Nuclear winter

Episode 43: Nuclear winter

Author: Tom Chivers and Stuart Ritchie July 9, 2024 Duration: 1:12:45

The UK has a new Prime Minister, and one of his first acts will have been to write letters to the captains of our nuclear missile submarines, telling them what to do in the event that the UK gets obliterated by a nuclear strike.

But what else might happen after a full-scale nuclear war? Many scientists—most notably Carl Sagan—have theorised that nuclear war would block out the sun, destroy crops, and maybe lead to human extinction. But it turns out this is a very controversial theory. In this rather grim episode of The Studies Show, Tom and Stuart try and work out who’s right, and if nuclear winter really would be the end of the world.

Another thing the new Prime Minister should be doing is reading Works in Progress magazine, the sponsor of The Studies Show. If he does, he’ll find a wealth of ideas that he and his government could use to spark progress and growth in the UK - and in particular, he should be reading the classic essay “The Housing Theory of Everything”. You can find that and much more at worksinprogress.co.

Show notes

* Putin warning the West that Russia is “ready” for nuclear war

* Ned Donovan’s article on the UK Prime Minister’s “Letters of Last Resort

* The 2024 test where the UK’s nuclear deterrent went “plop”

* Annie Jacobsen’s book Nuclear War: A Scenario

* A podcast episode and a Reddit thread criticising the book

* Wikipedia on the Moscow-Washington and Beijing-Washington phone lines

* The terrifying stories of Stanislav Petrov and Vasily Arkhipov

* Eric Schlosser’s book Command and Control, about nuclear near-misses

* The 11-ton “Mother Of All Bombs” (MOAB) vs. the 9-megaton B53 thermonuclear warhead

* Neil Halloran’s YouTube video on deaths during and after a nuclear explosion

* His later video discussing how he overstated nuclear winter effects

* The “Nuke Map”, where you can see how much of a given city would be in the blast radius of a variety of different warheads

* The two original 1983 nuclear winter papers in Science: the slightly more circumspect one; the one that mentions human extinction

* Long Effective Altruism forum post by Michael Hinge on the evidence for and against nuclear winter effects

* Even more detailed post on the same subject by Vasco Grilo

* Three papers from three different teams on a regional nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan:

* The Rutgers team’s original paper in 2014

* The follow-up by the Los Alamos team in 2018 (response from Rutgers; response from Los Alamos)

* The follow-up by the Lawrence Livermore team in 2020

* Carl Sagan’s prediction of severe climate effects from Iraq’s burning of the Kuwaiti oil wells in 1990/1991

* Discussion of why that didn’t happen

* The extremely sceptical Naval Gazing blog post on nuclear winter

* Paper from nuclear winter theorists accusing the US of genocide in Japan

* Toby Ord’s book The Precipice, on existential risk

Credits

The Studies Show is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions.



This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.com/subscribe

Every week, Tom Chivers and Stuart Ritchie pull apart the biggest arguments and most confusing claims making headlines. Science Fictions isn't just about celebrating breakthroughs; it's a necessary dive into the messy, contested, and often surprising realities of how science actually works. You'll hear them unpack heated debates, examine questionable studies, and explore why even solid research can sometimes lead to public confusion. This podcast serves as a guide through the noise, separating compelling evidence from overblown narratives. Each episode feels like a conversation with two deeply informed friends who aren't afraid to ask tough questions, offering clarity on topics that matter. For anyone curious about the stories behind the science headlines, this is an essential listen. Tune in for thoughtful analysis that goes beyond the press release, grounded in a genuine fascination with how we know what we know.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

Science Fictions
Podcast Episodes
Episode 65: Havana Syndrome and mass hysteria [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 52:00
Beginning in 2016, diplomats at the US Embassy in Havana started reporting strange concussion-like symptoms, even though they hadn’t taken a blow to the head. Some claimed they’d been the victim of a mysterious “sonic we…
Paid-only Episode 17: The lab leak hypothesis [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 10:47
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.comIt’s been five years since the start of the COVID pandemic (yes, you read that correctly—five years). And the debate still rage…
Episode 64: IQ [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:14:58
Every so often there’s a controversy related to IQ. The latest was caused by [checks notes] the new Vice President of the US attacking the IQ of a political podcaster on Twitter.You could argue that the VP should have be…
Episode 63: Philosophy of science [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:10:24
It had to happen eventually: this week The Studies Show is all about philosophy. As we look at science in general, how do we decide what those studies are actually showing? Tom and Stuart take a look at the Big Two of ph…
Episode 62: Violent videogames [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:04:55
Before the panic over social media—but after the panic over “video nasties”—was the panic over violent videogames. Was Pac-Man causing little Johnny so much frustration that he’d take it out on his siblings with his fist…
Paid-only Episode 16: Recycling [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 11:17
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.comIs recycling worthwhile? Is sending your rubbish to landfill actually so bad? Grab your cotton tote bag and join Tom and Stuart…
Episode 61: Conflict of interest [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:07:21
We want scientists to be paragons of objectivity. At the very least, we want them to tell us who’s paying their bills. But it turns out that in some fields of research, the norms about reporting financial conflicts of in…
Un-paywalled: Youth gender medicine & the Cass Review [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:15:24
This week, as a gift for New Year’s Eve, we’re opening up a previously-paywalled episode so that everyone can listen. It’s our episode from April 2024 on “Youth gender medicine & the Cass Review”. Since the show notes we…
Episode 60: Best and worst science of 2024 [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:05:41
In this final episode of 2024, Tom and Stuart talk about the most exciting scientific breakthroughs of the year… but temper it with some of the worst episodes of scientific fraud and misconduct, too. Then, just as a bonu…
Episode 59: The apocalypse [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:04:32
In this “fun”, festive episode of The Studies Show, Tom and Stuart discuss two ways—one man-made, one natural—that our species might be wiped off the planet.The first is “mirror life”, a science-fiction-sounding threat t…