Episode 75: Broken windows theory

Episode 75: Broken windows theory

Author: Tom Chivers and Stuart Ritchie June 10, 2025 Duration: 1:14:50

We all hate “urban decay”—graffiti, litter, boarded-up buildings. But does urban decay cause crime? That’s the premise of the “broken windows” theory: seeing a dilapidated and poorly-maintained physical environment emboldens criminals.

In this episode of The Studies Show, Tom and Stuart discuss the history of, and the evidence for, broken windows theory. The theory has inspired social psychologists, criminologists, and others to do an awful lot of studies—and as we’ll discover in this episode, it seems to have inspired scientists to commit a few crimes themselves…

The Studies Show is brought to you by Works in Progress magazine. In particular, it’s brought to you by this recent article on the world’s first electric grid, which is representative of the thoughtful, data-rich, well-written articles on human progress that you’ll find everywhere on the main site and its associated Substack.

Show notes

* Robert Jenrick confronts fare-dodgers on the London Tube…

* …and talks about “broken windows” in an interview afterwards

* The original “broken windows” article from The Atlantic in 1982

* Philip Zimbardo’s 1969 article, including the “Bronx vs. Palo Alto” study

* Diederik Stapel’s 2011 Science article on “coping with chaos”

* …and an article about him after his fraud was revealed

* The famous Keizer et al. study from 2008 (also in Science)

* 2014 article that’s highly critical of Keizer’s research

* 2017 failed replication of Keizer et al.

* Useful 2020 review article on the empirical evidence for broken windows theory

* 2018 Australian panel study on informal social control and crime

* Article arguing NYC had a major crime decline in the 1990s, but that it wasn’t through broken-windows policing

* Data on homicides in NYC by year

Credits

The Studies Show is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions.



This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.com/subscribe

Every week, Tom Chivers and Stuart Ritchie pull apart the biggest arguments and most confusing claims making headlines. Science Fictions isn't just about celebrating breakthroughs; it's a necessary dive into the messy, contested, and often surprising realities of how science actually works. You'll hear them unpack heated debates, examine questionable studies, and explore why even solid research can sometimes lead to public confusion. This podcast serves as a guide through the noise, separating compelling evidence from overblown narratives. Each episode feels like a conversation with two deeply informed friends who aren't afraid to ask tough questions, offering clarity on topics that matter. For anyone curious about the stories behind the science headlines, this is an essential listen. Tune in for thoughtful analysis that goes beyond the press release, grounded in a genuine fascination with how we know what we know.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

Science Fictions
Podcast Episodes
Episode 50: Toxoplasma [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:08:48
Been feeling a little strange lately? A bit impulsive, maybe? Feeling a sudden urge to get a pet cat? Sorry to say it, but maybe you’re infected with a scary mind control parasite: specifically, the paraside Toxoplasma g…
Paid-only Episode 12: Jonathan Haidt vs. social media [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 59:18
A while back, The Studies Show covered the question of whether smartphones and social media cause mental health problems. Amazingly, that podcast didn’t settle the issue, and the debate has continued—and continued rather…
Episode 49: Scientific publishing [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:16:13
It’s in a peer-reviewed paper, so it must be true. Right? Alas, you can only really hold this belief if you don’t know about the peer-review system, and scientific publishing more generally.That’s why, in this episode of…
Episode 48: Alcohol [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 55:19
Okay, it’s time to finally answer the question: is drinking booze good or bad? Is there really a “J-curve”, such that it’s bad to drink zero alcohol, good to drink a little, and then bad to drink any more than that? What…
Episode 47: The 25 year old brain [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:03:31
Everyone knows your brain hasn’t finished maturing until you’re 25. That’s so well-known, in fact, that some countries (like Scotland) have built it into their criminal justice system, giving lower sentences to under-25s…
Paid-only Episode 11: Sex education [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 10:39
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.comDid your schoolteacher also do the thing with the banana and the condom? It might’ve been cringe and awkward, but just ask the…
Episode 46: The marshmallow test [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:12:44
It’s one of the best-known findings of psychology research: kids who can delay gratification by not eating a marshmallow will grow up healther, wiser, and more successful. But guess what? Later studies had trouble findin…
First anniversary special [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:09:38
We’ve now been making this podcast for a year(!). We thought we’d mark the occasion with a grossly self-indulgent look back through our favourite episodes - and our least favourites, too. We’ve still got a massive list o…
Episode 45: Air pollution [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:04:59
Remember when they were coming to take your gas stove away? Every so often a study about the effects of air pollution on health goes viral, and we’re reminded again that seemingly innocuous objects—like your kitchen cook…
Paid-only Episode 10: Misinformation, debunked [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 11:00
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.comWe all agree that misinformation is bad. So why do we cringe when we hear prominent scientists and commentators talking about “…