Episode 99: Power posing

Episode 99: Power posing

Author: Tom Chivers and Stuart Ritchie March 31, 2026 Duration: 1:13:01

For a while in the early-to-mid 2010s, the most prominent psychology research in the world was on power posing. Harvard’s Amy Cuddy did a TED talk that reached tens of millions; her exhortation to “fake it til you make it” struck a chord and produced endless book sales from readers fascinated to hear how, just by adopting an expansive posture, you could revolutionise your own psychology and succeed at life.

In this episode, with the benefit of hindsight, we ask: what was that all about?

This podcast is sponsored by Works in Progress magazine. In today’s episode we mentioned “The Perks of Being a Mole Rat”, Aria Shrecker’s entertaining new piece on what makes some animals live for an inordinately long time. Find it and endless other fascinating pieces on human progress at worksinprogress.co.

Show notes

* Dana Carney (not Carvey)’s 2016 letter on changing her mind about power posing

* The 1996 study about walking more slowly down the hallway after reading words to do with old people

* Tom’s first and second pieces in Nature

* Daryl Bem’s piece on “Writing the Empirical Journal Article

* Amy Cuddy’s TED talk (the third most-watched ever)

* Two studies we mentioned on the facial feedback hypothesis

* 2014 NYT article on power posing and Amy Cuddy

* Amy Cuddy’s bestselling book, Presence

* UK Conservative Party politicians power posing for some reason

* The original 2010 power posing paper in Psychological Science

* A re-examination of the robustness of the results

* Ranehill et al.’s 2015 replication attempt

* Cuddy et al.’s “summary and review” from the same issue

* Simmons & Simonsohn on the whole evidence base on power posing

* Cuddy’s strategic retreat

* Meta-analysis on expansive vs. “lack of contractive” posing

Credits

The Science Fictions podcast is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions.



This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.com/subscribe

Every week, Tom Chivers and Stuart Ritchie pull apart the biggest arguments and most confusing claims making headlines. Science Fictions isn't just about celebrating breakthroughs; it's a necessary dive into the messy, contested, and often surprising realities of how science actually works. You'll hear them unpack heated debates, examine questionable studies, and explore why even solid research can sometimes lead to public confusion. This podcast serves as a guide through the noise, separating compelling evidence from overblown narratives. Each episode feels like a conversation with two deeply informed friends who aren't afraid to ask tough questions, offering clarity on topics that matter. For anyone curious about the stories behind the science headlines, this is an essential listen. Tune in for thoughtful analysis that goes beyond the press release, grounded in a genuine fascination with how we know what we know.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

Science Fictions
Podcast Episodes
Paid-only episode 23: Suicide contagion [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 10:40
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.comWarning: As you can tell from the title, this podcast covers a potentially distressing topic.Recent events have had us wonderin…
Episode 86: Food and climate [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 54:54
How can both of the following be true? (1) The world has record crop harvests this year; (2) climate change is ruining crop harvests and threatening food security. Does that make sense? Is it even really a contradiction?…
Episode 85: Insectageddon [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 56:16
What is that? What is that!? What is it!? Augh! No! Not the bees! NOT THE BEES! AAAAAUGGGHHHHH MY EYES! MY EYES! AAAGGHHHH!!!!This episode is about bees. And all insects, actually—are they in the process of being wiped o…
Episode 84: Brain training [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:07:04
5—6—3—4—3—1—7—2In the first episode under our new podcast name (it’s now the Science Fictions podcast!), we ask whatever happened to all those games that claimed to tell you your “brain age”—games that turned into a whol…
Episode 83: Dark matter and dark energy [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 56:41
Where is most of the universe? And why don't we know yet? Yes—we’re talking about dark matter and dark energy, the mysterious stuff that’s predicted by physical theory, but which still remains elusive in experiments.Afte…
Episode 82: Paper mills [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 47:07
In our last standard episode, we talked about retraction—removing papers from the scientific literature. Well, it turns out there’s an awful lot of retraction to do, in large part due to paper mills. These are fraudulent…
Unpaywalled: Diversity training [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:05:08
We’re very sorry about the disrupted service over this summer! It’s been hectic with work and a house move and various things. To tide you over, here’s a formerly paywalled episode: our very first one.…If you’ve ever don…
Episode 81: Retraction [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:11:53
RETRACTED // In this episode of The Studies Show, Tom and Stuart discuss retraction, the process of removing articles from the scientific record. How often is it due to fraud? How many papers get retracted—and is the num…
Episode 80: Mindfulness meditation [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:04:59
Pay attention. Focus on your breathing. Live in the moment. Accept yourself. Do you have a self? Focus on that self. And so on. This is, of course, the practice of mindfulness meditation, which seems to be everywhere: in…
Episode 79: Cancer rates [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 52:11
Are cancer rates going up or down? It seems like depending on where you look, you’ll find different answers to the question. What’s going on here — have some writers just got it completely wrong? Is it something to do wi…