“Three things that surprised me about technical grantmaking at Coefficient Giving (fka Open Phil)” by null

“Three things that surprised me about technical grantmaking at Coefficient Giving (fka Open Phil)” by null

Author: LessWrong December 4, 2025 Duration: 9:45
Open Philanthropy's Coefficient Giving's Technical AI Safety team is hiring grantmakers. I thought this would be a good moment to share some positive updates about the role that I’ve made since I joined the team a year ago.

tl;dr: I think this role is more impactful and more enjoyable than I anticipated when I started, and I think more people should consider applying.

It's not about the “marginal” grants

Some people think that being a grantmaker at Coefficient means sorting through a big pile of grant proposals and deciding which ones to say yes and no to. As a result, they think that the only impact at stake is how good our decisions are about marginal grants, since all the excellent grants are no-brainers.

But grantmakers don’t just evaluate proposals; we elicit them. I spend the majority of my time trying to figure out how to get better proposals into our pipeline: writing RFPs that describe the research projects we want to fund, or pitching promising researchers on AI safety research agendas, or steering applicants to better-targeted or more ambitious proposals.

Maybe more importantly, cG's technical AI safety grantmaking strategy is currently underdeveloped, and even junior grantmakers can help [...]

---

Outline:

(00:34) It's not about the marginal grants

(03:03) There is no counterfactual grantmaker

(05:15) Grantmaking is more fun/motivating than I anticipated

(08:35) Please apply!

---

First published:
November 26th, 2025

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/gLt7KJkhiEDwoPkae/three-things-that-surprised-me-about-technical-grantmaking

---



Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.


Dive into a stream of ideas where technology, culture, philosophy, and society intersect, all through the lens of the LessWrong (Curated & Popular) podcast. This isn't a traditional talk show with hosts, but rather a curated audio library of the most impactful writing from the LessWrong community. Each episode is a narration of a full post, selected for its high value and interesting arguments, focusing on pieces that have been formally curated or have garnered significant community approval. You'll hear clear, thoughtful readings of essays that tackle complex topics like artificial intelligence, rational thinking, moral philosophy, and the forces shaping our future. The audio format lets you absorb these dense, often paradigm-shifting concepts during a commute or a walk, turning written analysis into an immersive listening experience. This particular feed is deliberately selective, offering a manageable stream of the community's standout work. For those who want an even deeper dive into the discussion, there are broader feeds available. The LessWrong (Curated & Popular) podcast serves as an intellectual filter, delivering the signal through the noise and inviting you to engage with some of the most rigorously examined ideas on the internet.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
Podcast Episodes
"Opinionated Takes on Meetups Organizing" by jenn [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 15:53
Screwtape, as the global ACX meetups czar, has to be reasonable and responsible in his advice giving for running meetups. And the advice is great! It is unobjectionably great. I am here to give you more objectionable adv…
"How to game the METR plot" by shash42 [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 12:05
TL;DR: In 2025, we were in the 1-4 hour range, which has only 14 samples in METR's underlying data. The topic of each sample is public, making it easy to game METR horizon length measurements for a frontier lab, sometime…
"Scientific breakthroughs of the year" by technicalities [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 5:55
A couple of years ago, Gavin became frustrated with science journalism. No one was pulling together results across fields; the articles usually didn’t link to the original source; they didn't use probabilities (or even r…
"A high integrity/epistemics political machine?" by Raemon [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 19:04
I have goals that can only be reached via a powerful political machine. Probably a lot of other people around here share them. (Goals include “ensure no powerful dangerous AI get built”, “ensure governance of the US and…
“Insights into Claude Opus 4.5 from Pokémon” by Julian Bradshaw [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 17:41
Credit: Nano Banana, with some text provided. You may be surprised to learn that ClaudePlaysPokemon is still running today, and that Claude still hasn't beaten Pokémon Red, more than half a year after Google proudly anno…
“The funding conversation we left unfinished” by jenn [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 4:54
People working in the AI industry are making stupid amounts of money, and word on the street is that Anthropic is going to have some sort of liquidity event soon (for example possibly IPOing sometime next year). A lot of…