"What Washington Says About AGI" by zroe1

"What Washington Says About AGI" by zroe1

Author: LessWrong January 20, 2026 Duration: 14:16
I spent a few hundred dollars on Anthropic API credits and let Claude individually research every current US congressperson's position on AI. This is a summary of my findings.

Disclaimer: Summarizing people's beliefs is hard and inherently subjective and noisy. Likewise, US politicians change their opinions on things constantly so it's hard to know what's up-to-date. Also, I vibe-coded a lot of this.

Methodology

I used Claude Sonnet 4.5 with web search to research every congressperson's public statements on AI, then used GPT-4o to score each politician on how "AGI-pilled" they are, how concerned they are about existential risk, and how focused they are on US-China AI competition. I plotted these scores against GovTrack ideology data to search for any partisan splits.

1. AGI awareness is not partisan and not widespread

Few members of Congress have public statements taking AGI seriously. For those that do, the difference is not in political ideology. If we simply plot the AGI-pilled score vs the ideology score, we observe no obvious partisan split.

There are 151 congresspeople who Claude could not find substantial quotes about AI from. These members are not included on this plot or any of the plots which follow.

[...]

---

Outline:

(00:46) Methodology

(01:12) 1. AGI awareness is not partisan and not widespread

(01:56) 2. Existential risk is partisan at the tails

(02:51) 3. Both parties are fixated on China

(04:02) 4. Who in Congress is feeling the AGI?

(11:10) 5. Those who know the technology fear it.

(12:54) Appendix: How to use this data

The original text contained 2 footnotes which were omitted from this narration.

---

First published:
January 16th, 2026

Source:
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/WLdcvAcoFZv9enR37/what-washington-says-about-agi

---



Narrated by TYPE III AUDIO.

---

Images from the article:

Four panels showing politicians at different speaking events and hearings.
Scatter plot titled
Scatter plot titled

Dive into a stream of ideas where technology, culture, philosophy, and society intersect, all through the lens of the LessWrong (Curated & Popular) podcast. This isn't a traditional talk show with hosts, but rather a curated audio library of the most impactful writing from the LessWrong community. Each episode is a narration of a full post, selected for its high value and interesting arguments, focusing on pieces that have been formally curated or have garnered significant community approval. You'll hear clear, thoughtful readings of essays that tackle complex topics like artificial intelligence, rational thinking, moral philosophy, and the forces shaping our future. The audio format lets you absorb these dense, often paradigm-shifting concepts during a commute or a walk, turning written analysis into an immersive listening experience. This particular feed is deliberately selective, offering a manageable stream of the community's standout work. For those who want an even deeper dive into the discussion, there are broader feeds available. The LessWrong (Curated & Popular) podcast serves as an intellectual filter, delivering the signal through the noise and inviting you to engage with some of the most rigorously examined ideas on the internet.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
Podcast Episodes
"How to game the METR plot" by shash42 [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 12:05
TL;DR: In 2025, we were in the 1-4 hour range, which has only 14 samples in METR's underlying data. The topic of each sample is public, making it easy to game METR horizon length measurements for a frontier lab, sometime…
"Scientific breakthroughs of the year" by technicalities [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 5:55
A couple of years ago, Gavin became frustrated with science journalism. No one was pulling together results across fields; the articles usually didn’t link to the original source; they didn't use probabilities (or even r…
"A high integrity/epistemics political machine?" by Raemon [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 19:04
I have goals that can only be reached via a powerful political machine. Probably a lot of other people around here share them. (Goals include “ensure no powerful dangerous AI get built”, “ensure governance of the US and…
“Insights into Claude Opus 4.5 from Pokémon” by Julian Bradshaw [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 17:41
Credit: Nano Banana, with some text provided. You may be surprised to learn that ClaudePlaysPokemon is still running today, and that Claude still hasn't beaten Pokémon Red, more than half a year after Google proudly anno…
“The funding conversation we left unfinished” by jenn [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 4:54
People working in the AI industry are making stupid amounts of money, and word on the street is that Anthropic is going to have some sort of liquidity event soon (for example possibly IPOing sometime next year). A lot of…