Episode 118 - The difference between “moralising” and solving a moral problem

Episode 118 - The difference between “moralising” and solving a moral problem

Author: Bart Vanderhaegen April 14, 2022 Duration: 8:59

Moralising

  • Start from a situation that they consider a moral problem
  • Something immoral, unfair
  • But then …
    • Reverting to blaming the people,
      • generalizing from a specific event to general characteristics of the person in question or groups of people
    • Excluding the possibility that people can learn from mistakes
    • Appealing to condemnation of those people
    • Signaling that you are not one of those people, that you have more truth

Solving a moral problem is the opposite

  • Identifying the problem, even asking if it is a real moral problem
  • Go into the specifics of the problem, the context, the actual events, criticisms on certain claims about the event … consider all your claims fallible, you seek more truth
  • Propose and test solutions

Bart Vanderhaegen hosts Rapid Idea Improvement, a podcast that digs into a powerful and practical question: how do ideas actually get better? Instead of staying in the abstract, it applies the principles of knowledge growth-particularly those from thinkers like Karl Popper and David Deutsch-to the messy, real-world domains of business, management, and economics, while also reaching into fields like physics for broader insight. Each episode is an exploration of critical rationalism in action, examining how we can systematically criticize and refine our thinking to solve problems more effectively. You’ll hear discussions that treat business challenges not as puzzles with fixed answers, but as opportunities for evolutionary idea improvement, where bold conjectures and rigorous error-correction drive progress. This isn't about motivational tips or surface-level analysis; it's about building a deeper framework for understanding how knowledge expands, and then using that framework to make your own thinking more potent and adaptable. The conversations in this podcast are for anyone who suspects that the way we approach problems-in leadership, strategy, or innovation-can be fundamentally upgraded. By weaving together epistemology with practical application, the show aims to provide listeners with a genuinely useful toolkit for accelerating the development of their most important ideas.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

Rapid Idea Improvement
Podcast Episodes
Episode 161: Philosophy of science : empiricism [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 10:17
Empiricism in the philosophy of science emphasizes evidence, especially as discovered in experiments. It is a fundamental part of the scientific method that all hypotheses and theories must be tested against observations…
Episode 158: Why knowing how the customer thinks is not enough [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 6:48
Suppose you are a sales perons, and have a product that allows the customer to be 3% more efficient in his operations Why is just tranferring that knowledge to the customer not enough to make him buy your product ? You m…
Episode 157: The only problem a salesperson has to solve [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 9:24
What problem ? “What can I do to influence the subjective valuation of my product by the prospect?” Why that problem ? You only sell something if the customer values your product more than its price (and more than altern…