Episode 118 - The difference between “moralising” and solving a moral problem

Episode 118 - The difference between “moralising” and solving a moral problem

Author: Bart Vanderhaegen April 14, 2022 Duration: 8:59

Moralising

  • Start from a situation that they consider a moral problem
  • Something immoral, unfair
  • But then …
    • Reverting to blaming the people,
      • generalizing from a specific event to general characteristics of the person in question or groups of people
    • Excluding the possibility that people can learn from mistakes
    • Appealing to condemnation of those people
    • Signaling that you are not one of those people, that you have more truth

Solving a moral problem is the opposite

  • Identifying the problem, even asking if it is a real moral problem
  • Go into the specifics of the problem, the context, the actual events, criticisms on certain claims about the event … consider all your claims fallible, you seek more truth
  • Propose and test solutions

Bart Vanderhaegen hosts Rapid Idea Improvement, a podcast that digs into a powerful and practical question: how do ideas actually get better? Instead of staying in the abstract, it applies the principles of knowledge growth-particularly those from thinkers like Karl Popper and David Deutsch-to the messy, real-world domains of business, management, and economics, while also reaching into fields like physics for broader insight. Each episode is an exploration of critical rationalism in action, examining how we can systematically criticize and refine our thinking to solve problems more effectively. You’ll hear discussions that treat business challenges not as puzzles with fixed answers, but as opportunities for evolutionary idea improvement, where bold conjectures and rigorous error-correction drive progress. This isn't about motivational tips or surface-level analysis; it's about building a deeper framework for understanding how knowledge expands, and then using that framework to make your own thinking more potent and adaptable. The conversations in this podcast are for anyone who suspects that the way we approach problems-in leadership, strategy, or innovation-can be fundamentally upgraded. By weaving together epistemology with practical application, the show aims to provide listeners with a genuinely useful toolkit for accelerating the development of their most important ideas.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

Rapid Idea Improvement
Podcast Episodes
Episode 145 : Why is epistemology relevant and important ? [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 9:01
Epistemology is relevant when explaining *any* human activity, as it is a better/ deeper explanation than explanations at the level of behaviours (actions) or personality (assessments of persons as a whole)
Episode 144 : on the use of KPIs [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 12:36
Key aspects discussed related to how companies typically use KPIs Start from the KPI and not from the problem and solution (for which the KPI was supposed to be an indicator) Corrective actions are parochial and without…
Episode 140: The problem with problem solving [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 12:36
It is not contested that managers rely on their teams to get problems solved. However, in practise this turns out less easy than stated here. I go into some of the reasons why it is not trivial and concrete ways for impr…
Episode 137 - A critique of the Lencioni pyramid in teamwork [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 6:47
The natural state of any relationship is that fact that ideas differ. That is not “a shame” … or a proof that there is distrust. It is just the natural starting position. If it were a proof of distrust, then the first st…