Episode 118 - The difference between “moralising” and solving a moral problem

Episode 118 - The difference between “moralising” and solving a moral problem

Author: Bart Vanderhaegen April 14, 2022 Duration: 8:59

Moralising

  • Start from a situation that they consider a moral problem
  • Something immoral, unfair
  • But then …
    • Reverting to blaming the people,
      • generalizing from a specific event to general characteristics of the person in question or groups of people
    • Excluding the possibility that people can learn from mistakes
    • Appealing to condemnation of those people
    • Signaling that you are not one of those people, that you have more truth

Solving a moral problem is the opposite

  • Identifying the problem, even asking if it is a real moral problem
  • Go into the specifics of the problem, the context, the actual events, criticisms on certain claims about the event … consider all your claims fallible, you seek more truth
  • Propose and test solutions

Bart Vanderhaegen hosts Rapid Idea Improvement, a podcast that digs into a powerful and practical question: how do ideas actually get better? Instead of staying in the abstract, it applies the principles of knowledge growth-particularly those from thinkers like Karl Popper and David Deutsch-to the messy, real-world domains of business, management, and economics, while also reaching into fields like physics for broader insight. Each episode is an exploration of critical rationalism in action, examining how we can systematically criticize and refine our thinking to solve problems more effectively. You’ll hear discussions that treat business challenges not as puzzles with fixed answers, but as opportunities for evolutionary idea improvement, where bold conjectures and rigorous error-correction drive progress. This isn't about motivational tips or surface-level analysis; it's about building a deeper framework for understanding how knowledge expands, and then using that framework to make your own thinking more potent and adaptable. The conversations in this podcast are for anyone who suspects that the way we approach problems-in leadership, strategy, or innovation-can be fundamentally upgraded. By weaving together epistemology with practical application, the show aims to provide listeners with a genuinely useful toolkit for accelerating the development of their most important ideas.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

Rapid Idea Improvement
Podcast Episodes
Episode 114 - The difference between fallibility and failing [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 6:11
You have failed versus you are fallible You have failed = subjective judgment, because the standard against which you have failed can be anything to anybody The same objective series of events can still be labeled as fai…
Episode 113 - You cannot justify a decision by appeal to authority [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 9:42
Authority can never be a "logically correct" justification for taking a particular decision. Instead what we do (individually when contemplating a decision, or together) do is compare the content of candidate decisions,…
Episode 110 - The key question a CEO should lie awake about at night [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 14:50
The question for all CEO's: "How am I making it easy to correct errors in my organisation?" People are solving problems. They do that with idea’s. Some ideas are suggested, but many need to be developed. All initial idea…