Episode 41: Criminal justice and forensic science

Episode 41: Criminal justice and forensic science

Author: Tom Chivers and Stuart Ritchie June 18, 2024 Duration: 1:01:35

The criminal justice system and science are both broadly looking for the same thing - the truth. But in many cases the two don’t mix well. Whether it’s court cases that attempt to decide the truth of a scientific dispute, or the use of fingerprints, DNA, or statistics by the prosecution in a murder case, a lot can go wrong - and there’s a lot at stake.

Inspired by the recent discussion, or perhaps lack of discussion, around [a criminal case nobody in the UK can talk about for legal reasons], Tom and Stuart spend this episode looking into what happens when science meets the law.

Our favourite online magazine is Works in Progress - so it’s particularly pleasing that they’re the sponsors of The Studies Show. Works in Progress publish in-depth essays on underrated ideas to improve the world, covering the history and future of science and technology. Go to worksinprogress.co to read their entire archive for free.

Show notes

* UK man arrested for airport-related joke (2010); UK man arrested and punished (narrowly avoiding prison) for saying “burn auld fella, buuuuurn” upon the death of “Captain Tom” (2022)

* Simon Singh successfully sued by chiropractors (but then successfully appeals; 2010)

* Paper on the Italian criminal cases that helped fuel the anti-vaccine movement

* Jim Carrey campaigns against vaccines

* Tom’s 2018 New Scientist article on glyphosate and cancer

* 1995 article on the “phantom risks” of breast implants

* Helen Joyce on the Sally Clark case

* Tom’s 2024 Unherd article on “the dangers of trial by statistics

* 2022 Royal Statistical Society report on the same topic

* How Bayes-savvy statisticians helped overturn Lucia de Berk’s conviction

* Gerd Gigerenzer on OJ Simpson

* 2022 philosophy paper on the issues with forensic science

* 2016 White House report on the gaps in forensic science

* Dror & Hampikian (2011) study on bias in DNA interpretation

* 2009 “Texas sharpshooter” paper on the rarity (or not) of DNA matches

* Useful 2023 review of human factors research in forensic science

* Interviews with 150 forensic examiners on potential biases in their work

Credits

The Studies Show is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions.



This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.com/subscribe

Every week, Tom Chivers and Stuart Ritchie pull apart the biggest arguments and most confusing claims making headlines. Science Fictions isn't just about celebrating breakthroughs; it's a necessary dive into the messy, contested, and often surprising realities of how science actually works. You'll hear them unpack heated debates, examine questionable studies, and explore why even solid research can sometimes lead to public confusion. This podcast serves as a guide through the noise, separating compelling evidence from overblown narratives. Each episode feels like a conversation with two deeply informed friends who aren't afraid to ask tough questions, offering clarity on topics that matter. For anyone curious about the stories behind the science headlines, this is an essential listen. Tune in for thoughtful analysis that goes beyond the press release, grounded in a genuine fascination with how we know what we know.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

Science Fictions
Podcast Episodes
Episode 65: Havana Syndrome and mass hysteria [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 52:00
Beginning in 2016, diplomats at the US Embassy in Havana started reporting strange concussion-like symptoms, even though they hadn’t taken a blow to the head. Some claimed they’d been the victim of a mysterious “sonic we…
Paid-only Episode 17: The lab leak hypothesis [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 10:47
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.comIt’s been five years since the start of the COVID pandemic (yes, you read that correctly—five years). And the debate still rage…
Episode 64: IQ [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:14:58
Every so often there’s a controversy related to IQ. The latest was caused by [checks notes] the new Vice President of the US attacking the IQ of a political podcaster on Twitter.You could argue that the VP should have be…
Episode 63: Philosophy of science [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:10:24
It had to happen eventually: this week The Studies Show is all about philosophy. As we look at science in general, how do we decide what those studies are actually showing? Tom and Stuart take a look at the Big Two of ph…
Episode 62: Violent videogames [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:04:55
Before the panic over social media—but after the panic over “video nasties”—was the panic over violent videogames. Was Pac-Man causing little Johnny so much frustration that he’d take it out on his siblings with his fist…
Paid-only Episode 16: Recycling [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 11:17
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.comIs recycling worthwhile? Is sending your rubbish to landfill actually so bad? Grab your cotton tote bag and join Tom and Stuart…
Episode 61: Conflict of interest [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:07:21
We want scientists to be paragons of objectivity. At the very least, we want them to tell us who’s paying their bills. But it turns out that in some fields of research, the norms about reporting financial conflicts of in…
Un-paywalled: Youth gender medicine & the Cass Review [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:15:24
This week, as a gift for New Year’s Eve, we’re opening up a previously-paywalled episode so that everyone can listen. It’s our episode from April 2024 on “Youth gender medicine & the Cass Review”. Since the show notes we…
Episode 60: Best and worst science of 2024 [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:05:41
In this final episode of 2024, Tom and Stuart talk about the most exciting scientific breakthroughs of the year… but temper it with some of the worst episodes of scientific fraud and misconduct, too. Then, just as a bonu…
Episode 59: The apocalypse [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:04:32
In this “fun”, festive episode of The Studies Show, Tom and Stuart discuss two ways—one man-made, one natural—that our species might be wiped off the planet.The first is “mirror life”, a science-fiction-sounding threat t…