Episode 46: The marshmallow test

Episode 46: The marshmallow test

Author: Tom Chivers and Stuart Ritchie August 13, 2024 Duration: 1:12:44

It’s one of the best-known findings of psychology research: kids who can delay gratification by not eating a marshmallow will grow up healther, wiser, and more successful. But guess what? Later studies had trouble finding the same results. What do we actually know about delaying gratification?

Get ready to control yourselves, because in this episode of The Studies Show, Tom and Stuart tell the story of yet another famous psychological study that turned out not to live up to the hype.

The Studies Show is sponsored by Works in Progress magazine. If you’re looking for thoughtful essays on areas of policy, science, and technology that you might not have considered previously, there’s no better place. Check it out at worksinprogress.co.

Show notes

* The famous 1988 paper by Walter Mischel and colleagues on predicting teenage outcomes from childhood marshmallow test performance, and the famous 1990 one (including the SAT predictions)

* And the much older research that this follows up

* Walter Mischel’s 2014 book The Marshmallow Test

* Publicity piece on the book in Vox

* First proper replication study from 2018

* Debate about how the study used covariates

* Really good Vox article describing the replication

* 2021 paper (co-authored by Mischel) following up on the original participants

* New 2024 paper following up on the replication study

* Heavily-cited 2011 paper from the Dunedin study on the predictive power of self-control measures

* Inzlicht and Roberts (2024) on trait vs. state self-control, and why we might have been thinking about this the wrong way

Credits

The Studies Show is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions.



This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.com/subscribe

Every week, Tom Chivers and Stuart Ritchie pull apart the biggest arguments and most confusing claims making headlines. Science Fictions isn't just about celebrating breakthroughs; it's a necessary dive into the messy, contested, and often surprising realities of how science actually works. You'll hear them unpack heated debates, examine questionable studies, and explore why even solid research can sometimes lead to public confusion. This podcast serves as a guide through the noise, separating compelling evidence from overblown narratives. Each episode feels like a conversation with two deeply informed friends who aren't afraid to ask tough questions, offering clarity on topics that matter. For anyone curious about the stories behind the science headlines, this is an essential listen. Tune in for thoughtful analysis that goes beyond the press release, grounded in a genuine fascination with how we know what we know.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

Science Fictions
Podcast Episodes
Episode 93: Many analysts [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:18:44
Here’s a cheery one for our first episode of the year. Guess what happens when you give several sets of scientists the same dataset and ask them to answer the same question? Well, they all find the same results, right? R…
A Christmas 2025 compendium [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 32:24
We’ve covered a lot of bad science stories over the year. Here are a few more. But in the optimistic spirit of the “holiday season”, the last one has a happy ending. Thanks for listening—especially if you’re a subscriber…
Episode 92: Oliver Sacks [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:10:06
STOP PRESS: a beloved 20th Century populariser of psychology who wrote massively successful books has been shown to be full of crap. Actually… don’t stop press. Just put it on the pile with all the others.This time it’s…
Paid-only episode 25: The menopause and hormone replacement therapy [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 10:26
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.comDoes the evidence support the use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT)? Depends on when you asked the question. At one point th…
Unpaywalled: Jonathan Haidt vs. social media [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:00:00
Hello everyone! We weren’t able to record a podcast this week, because 1) Stuart was busy and 2) it’s Tom’s birthday. So by way of apology we’re re-releasing this one about some drama last year between Jon Haidt, sworn e…
Episode 91: Entangled Life and the wood wide web [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:01:28
Everyone has read Entangled Life, the wonderfully-written book about fungi that took the world by storm about 5 years ago. Among many other things, it popularised the “wood wide web”—the idea that trees can communicate w…
Episode 90: Cognitive dissonance [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:05:04
It has happened again. A new paper, based on a tranche of unsealed historical documents, casts serious doubt on a piece of social psychology research from the mid-20th Century. Shocker!This time it’s about some of the fu…
Paid-only episode 24: Creatine [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 11:03
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.comCreatine is the supplement of the moment, but both of us had vaguely heard that this one might actually not be total garbage.On…
Episode 89: Halloween special on reincarnation [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:02:37
Around these parts, we have a tradition to do a paranormal episode at Halloween. We’ve done psychic powers, ghosts, and now… reincarnation. What are we to make of the stories—sometimes told in NYT-bestselling books—of ch…
Episode 88: Wellbeing [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 53:39
Maybe it’s the most important thing any scientist can study: what makes people happy? The trouble is, despite the importance, a lot of the science on “wellbeing” tends to be very rickety.But did you know that even one of…