Episode 46: The marshmallow test

Episode 46: The marshmallow test

Author: Tom Chivers and Stuart Ritchie August 13, 2024 Duration: 1:12:44

It’s one of the best-known findings of psychology research: kids who can delay gratification by not eating a marshmallow will grow up healther, wiser, and more successful. But guess what? Later studies had trouble finding the same results. What do we actually know about delaying gratification?

Get ready to control yourselves, because in this episode of The Studies Show, Tom and Stuart tell the story of yet another famous psychological study that turned out not to live up to the hype.

The Studies Show is sponsored by Works in Progress magazine. If you’re looking for thoughtful essays on areas of policy, science, and technology that you might not have considered previously, there’s no better place. Check it out at worksinprogress.co.

Show notes

* The famous 1988 paper by Walter Mischel and colleagues on predicting teenage outcomes from childhood marshmallow test performance, and the famous 1990 one (including the SAT predictions)

* And the much older research that this follows up

* Walter Mischel’s 2014 book The Marshmallow Test

* Publicity piece on the book in Vox

* First proper replication study from 2018

* Debate about how the study used covariates

* Really good Vox article describing the replication

* 2021 paper (co-authored by Mischel) following up on the original participants

* New 2024 paper following up on the replication study

* Heavily-cited 2011 paper from the Dunedin study on the predictive power of self-control measures

* Inzlicht and Roberts (2024) on trait vs. state self-control, and why we might have been thinking about this the wrong way

Credits

The Studies Show is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions.



This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.com/subscribe

Every week, Tom Chivers and Stuart Ritchie pull apart the biggest arguments and most confusing claims making headlines. Science Fictions isn't just about celebrating breakthroughs; it's a necessary dive into the messy, contested, and often surprising realities of how science actually works. You'll hear them unpack heated debates, examine questionable studies, and explore why even solid research can sometimes lead to public confusion. This podcast serves as a guide through the noise, separating compelling evidence from overblown narratives. Each episode feels like a conversation with two deeply informed friends who aren't afraid to ask tough questions, offering clarity on topics that matter. For anyone curious about the stories behind the science headlines, this is an essential listen. Tune in for thoughtful analysis that goes beyond the press release, grounded in a genuine fascination with how we know what we know.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

Science Fictions
Podcast Episodes
Episode 65: Havana Syndrome and mass hysteria [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 52:00
Beginning in 2016, diplomats at the US Embassy in Havana started reporting strange concussion-like symptoms, even though they hadn’t taken a blow to the head. Some claimed they’d been the victim of a mysterious “sonic we…
Paid-only Episode 17: The lab leak hypothesis [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 10:47
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.comIt’s been five years since the start of the COVID pandemic (yes, you read that correctly—five years). And the debate still rage…
Episode 64: IQ [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:14:58
Every so often there’s a controversy related to IQ. The latest was caused by [checks notes] the new Vice President of the US attacking the IQ of a political podcaster on Twitter.You could argue that the VP should have be…
Episode 63: Philosophy of science [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:10:24
It had to happen eventually: this week The Studies Show is all about philosophy. As we look at science in general, how do we decide what those studies are actually showing? Tom and Stuart take a look at the Big Two of ph…
Episode 62: Violent videogames [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:04:55
Before the panic over social media—but after the panic over “video nasties”—was the panic over violent videogames. Was Pac-Man causing little Johnny so much frustration that he’d take it out on his siblings with his fist…
Paid-only Episode 16: Recycling [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 11:17
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.comIs recycling worthwhile? Is sending your rubbish to landfill actually so bad? Grab your cotton tote bag and join Tom and Stuart…
Episode 61: Conflict of interest [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:07:21
We want scientists to be paragons of objectivity. At the very least, we want them to tell us who’s paying their bills. But it turns out that in some fields of research, the norms about reporting financial conflicts of in…
Un-paywalled: Youth gender medicine & the Cass Review [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:15:24
This week, as a gift for New Year’s Eve, we’re opening up a previously-paywalled episode so that everyone can listen. It’s our episode from April 2024 on “Youth gender medicine & the Cass Review”. Since the show notes we…
Episode 60: Best and worst science of 2024 [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:05:41
In this final episode of 2024, Tom and Stuart talk about the most exciting scientific breakthroughs of the year… but temper it with some of the worst episodes of scientific fraud and misconduct, too. Then, just as a bonu…
Episode 59: The apocalypse [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:04:32
In this “fun”, festive episode of The Studies Show, Tom and Stuart discuss two ways—one man-made, one natural—that our species might be wiped off the planet.The first is “mirror life”, a science-fiction-sounding threat t…