Episode 57: Collider bias

Episode 57: Collider bias

Author: Tom Chivers and Stuart Ritchie November 26, 2024 Duration: 1:00:30

Among patients hospitalized for COVID, smokers had better outcomes. Among people with cardiovascular disease, those with obesity live longer. Among NBA basketballers, taller players don’t do any better. These are all facts. But the interpretation you might immediately draw is completely wrong.

It turns out that these findings (and many more) might be due to the weird and under-discussed phenomenon of “collider bias”. Everyone who’s interested in scientific methods knows what a confounder is—but do they know what a collider is? In this episode of The Studies Show, Tom and Stuart attempt to explain.

We’re delighted to announce our sponsor for the next month: GiveWell. They’re the organisation who use rigorous evidence to point you towards the highest-impact charities. Want to make sure your donation goes as far as possible, maximising the lives that you’ll save and improve? GiveWell.org is the place to go.

And here’s a fantastic opportunity: if you’re a new donor, GiveWell will match up to $100 of your charitable donation if you go to GiveWell.org, then choose “PODCAST” and enter “The Studies Show” at checkout.

Show notes

* French study on COVID and smoking rates

* French doctors handing out nicotine patches during the pandemic

* Review of 13 studies in China showing lower smoking rates in those hospitalised for COVID

* Among heart attack sufferers, smokers have better subsequent health

* Obesity linked to improved survival among patients with a wide range of diseases

* Within the NBA, tall basketball players do no better than short ones

* Standardized testing doesn’t predict how well graduate physics students do

* The same but for biology

* The same but for STEM in general

* Do neurotic people actually live longer, once you correct for self-rated health?

* Julia Rohrer’s blog article on collider bias, using the conscientiousness/IQ relation

* The “collider scope” paper - one of the best explanations of the phenomenon

* Article on “the obsesity paradox

* Follow-up arguing that it might not be a paradox at all

Credits

The Studies Show is produced by Julian Mayers at Yada Yada Productions.



This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.com/subscribe

Every week, Tom Chivers and Stuart Ritchie pull apart the biggest arguments and most confusing claims making headlines. Science Fictions isn't just about celebrating breakthroughs; it's a necessary dive into the messy, contested, and often surprising realities of how science actually works. You'll hear them unpack heated debates, examine questionable studies, and explore why even solid research can sometimes lead to public confusion. This podcast serves as a guide through the noise, separating compelling evidence from overblown narratives. Each episode feels like a conversation with two deeply informed friends who aren't afraid to ask tough questions, offering clarity on topics that matter. For anyone curious about the stories behind the science headlines, this is an essential listen. Tune in for thoughtful analysis that goes beyond the press release, grounded in a genuine fascination with how we know what we know.
Author: Language: English Episodes: 100

Science Fictions
Podcast Episodes
Episode 36: Vitamin D [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 59:21
Preventing cancer. Curing depression. Single-handedly ending the COVID-19 pandemic. Oh, and something to do with your bones. Is there anything Vitamin D can’t do?Maybe the answer is: “quite a lot”. In this episode of The…
Episode 35: The loneliness epidemic [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 54:48
We can all agree that being lonely is bad. But apparently, science shows it’s really, really bad. Indeed, being lonely is so dangerous to your health that its equivalent to smoking 15 cigarettes a day. And it gets worse:…
Paid-only Episode 7: Youth gender medicine & the Cass Review [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 10:41
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.comThe evidence for puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones for young people with gender dysphoria is “remarkably weak”. That’s ac…
Episode 34: Does depression exist? [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:02:54
Several previous episodes of The Studies Show have covered depression and treatments for it, but none have really considered what depression is. It’s time to do that. It turns out that some scientists have made serious c…
Episode 33: Probability (and Tom's new book) [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:02:12
Everything is Predictable: How Bayes' Remarkable Theorem Explains the World. That’s the new book—out on April 25 in the UK and May 7 in the US—by our very own Tom Chivers!In this episode of The Studies Show, Tom and Stua…
Episode 32: Microplastics [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:00:30
Microplastics are everywhere: there are teeny-tiny plastic particles in your drinking water, your food, your air - and perhaps even in your internal organs. How worried should you be?In this episode of The Studies Show,…
Studies Show Short 1: Emotional Intelligence [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 22:33
As an extra way of thanking our paid subscribers, we’re going to post some shorter episodes in addition to the usual weekly hour-long ones.This first short episode (available to everyone for free; after this they’re paid…
Paid-only Episode 6: Bicycle helmets [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 10:06
This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit sciencefictionspod.substack.comMost people think it’s obvious that you should wear a helmet when cycling. It might save your life if you fall off and hit your…
Episode 31: The trouble with meta-analysis [not-audio_url] [/not-audio_url]

Duration: 1:09:35
We all love to cite meta-analyses. They’re the review studies where scientists take every single piece of research ever published on a particular question, and then calculate the overall “true” effect across all of them.…

«1...678910